He didn't talk about it. I suggest not to hold your breath about it though. It'd be nice, but I personally doubt they'll reissue the old CE items.
Printable View
I don't know, there was Onion Knight armour shown in one of the older presentations. I think it was on a Crystal Tower slide. I don't know why they'd advertise it and not include it in the game.
Me personally, I wouldn't be playing a Japanese game if i expected solid (insert non-Japanese language here). Especially since his point partially points to the fact this is indeed a Japanese game which generally is known to have quality VO work. So if it's bad in (language), slap on subtitles and listen to the default track.
However, I think the whole "RP" thing is a bit silly. I know this is an RPG, but MMOs are so far from sticking to the RP elements that you can't really hold it in the same light as how the general playerbase will be perceiving. (The ones SE will actually get the most money from.)
Yea it did :) I can't get a hold of the pic right now, but the helm was how I recognised it.
EDIT: http://www.finalfantasy.net/xiv/fina...oducer-live-5/ It's on the slide with Gilgamesh. I can't host the image right now but it's on there!
Funnily enough it actually seems a different item from what we have been given with the CE:
http://thehut.pantherssl.com/design-...939/Final1.JPG
The cloth part under the chin and around the neck is dark instead of light grey.
Also the armor is different from the onion armor we had with 1.0
http://i132.photobucket.com/albums/q...1290438638.jpg
I would say it's probably a completely different set. Mind you, not that it's really important to me, because I'll be found dead before wearing that helm, even if I have it :D
except you always say other people are mad. always. without fail. and when people dare suggest it's actually *you* who seems upset, you either say "no u" or make it seem silly they'd say "no u" in spite of how many times you've used the same tactic yourself. it's awfully transparent.
stop acting like an angsty fourteen year old 4chan anon and get a new shtick, chief.
1. get called out for a very specific behavior
2. exhibit precisely the behavior you're called out for, but project it onto others (as predicted)
3. ???
4. profit desu
The difference is that I didn't call you (or anyone else) a "angsty fourteen year old 4chan anon" or any other derogatory definitions, which quite obviously defeats your comparison.
If you can't make a point without attacking your counterpart on a personal level, you may want not to make a point at all, because it only proves my point. So thank you very much.