MSQ cutscene skipping against TOS?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SerLuke

A few posts up you flat out blame someone else for you getting reported, that wasn’t me putting words in your mouth and it tells me all I need to know about you.

---

Still at it? Ok:

I didn't blame anyone, I merely stated I was reported, which was obviously done by someone else because I didn't report myself :rolleyes:

So you twist that statement and then mix it up with a completely unrelated post where you claimed I was defending TOS breakers when I wasn't, as if me stating I was reported somehow makes it untrue that you made that up.

And at the end of that amazing construct you cooked up you come to the conclusion that you know enough about me. Congratulations I guess. Can we move on now? lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PvpDRG

Is there anyway I can contact a GM to confirm this question? Because if it's possible to do with no problems then I'd like to do it as it cuts off 30 minutes to the longer of the two dungeons. Not everyone can play 15 hours a day. Simply not doing the roulette would be a huge blow for leveling my jobs as it gives by far the most amount of exp.

---

You don't need to play 15 hours a day to watch all of the cut scenes. This dungeon is not 15 hours long.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RoyalBeef

Still at it? Ok:

I didn't blame anyone, I merely stated I was reported, which was obviously done by someone else because I didn't report myself :rolleyes:

So you twist that statement and then mix it up with a completely unrelated post where you claimed I was defending TOS breakers when I wasn't, as if me stating I was reported somehow makes it untrue that you made that up.

And at the end of that amazing construct you cooked up you come to the conclusion that you know enough about me. Congratulations I guess. Can we move on now? lol

---

I was prepared to move on till you brought it up again to the other poster.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SerLuke

I was prepared to move on till you brought it up again to the other poster.

---

Well if you don't like people calling you out for purposefully misrepresenting what they said by adding made up things to your pseudo summary of their point, you should probably stop doing it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RoyalBeef

Well if you don't like people calling you out for purposefully misrepresenting what they said by adding made up things to your pseudo summary of their point, you should probably stop doing it.

---

Again I misrepresented nothing, putting blame on someone else for you getting yourself reported is not accepting responsibility for the actions you did to get yourself reported in the first place. I follow a simple rule in game, don’t be a jerk and follow the rules, I’ve never been to GM jail or suspended from the game or even warned, it’s not difficult. Rule breaking doesn’t need to be excused or defended.

If you screwed up then own up to it and move on instead of looking for reporters to blame.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SerLuke

Again I misrepresented nothing, putting blame on someone else for you getting yourself reported is not accepting responsibility for the actions you did to get yourself reported in the first place. I follow a simple rule in game, don’t be a jerk and follow the rules, I’ve never been to GM jail or suspended from the game or even warned, it’s not difficult. Rule breaking doesn’t need to be excused or defended.

If you screwed up then own up to it and move on instead of looking for reporters to blame.

---

From here on I'll ignore your desperate tries to derail the conversation. You said I was defending people who break TOS. So please, point me to where I did that. If you can't, you were misrepresenting me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RoyalBeef

From here on I'll ignore your desperate tries to derail the conversation. You said I was defending people who break TOS. So please, point me to where I did that. If you can't, you were misrepresenting me.

---

You were flat out mocking someone who was rightfully reporting people who use the cutscene skipping exploit.

I was in Castrum the first time in 2014. Do you know when I saw the cutscenes I am supposed to watch during the dungeon the first time? May 2019.



Yep, I took a break, but I ran the dungeon like 50-60 times without knowing what I actually did or why everything was suddenly in flames etc. And it was NOT possible to watch the cutscenes in the inn room back then because there were other players shown (you know, your party members) and these cutscenes were not in the log. Only those where you and NPCs are, but not with randoms.


If people want Tomestones so badly that they kick newbies, for whose this Roulette exists (and a hefty bonus), aside, votekick them for being in the cutscenes or just ruin the entire run for them by already killing bosses without the player, they should be reported indeed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RoyalBeef

Pretty sure new players are fine without self proclaimed vigilantes like you. Also getting your dopamine kicks from reporting people doesn't seem healthy.

---

https://imgur.com/rE12zzO.png

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SerLuke

You were flat out mocking someone who was rightfully reporting people who use the cutscene skipping exploit.

---

Getting the kind of sick thrill out of reporting people that you have to gloat about it on the forum doesn't seem like the most healthy mindset to me is what I said. That's not defending TOS breakers, so I'm still waiting for you to point me to that part.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RoyalBeef

Getting the kind of sick thrill out of reporting people that you have to gloat about it on the forum doesn't seem like the most healthy mindset to me is what I said. That's not defending TOS breakers, so I'm still waiting for you to point me to that part.

---

Okay fine, answer this simple yes or no question and prove me wrong.

Should people that use the cutscene skip exploit be reported and temp banned?

If your answer is yes I’ll be more than happy to admit I misunderstood your posts.