Just found out this old MMO called World of Warcraft (never heard of it) has Warrior and Paladin classes in it. Is Square in trouble? Are they going to be sued by Buzzard Entertainment (creator of Wow)
Printable View
Just found out this old MMO called World of Warcraft (never heard of it) has Warrior and Paladin classes in it. Is Square in trouble? Are they going to be sued by Buzzard Entertainment (creator of Wow)
I know you are just tongue-in-cheek, but anyway....
Paladin as a class goes back to the original "Greyhawk" supplement for Dungeons&Dragons, from 1975. But that version of paladins was in turn heavily inspired by the novel "Three Hearts and Three Lions" by Poul Anderson, from 1961.
But the word "paladin" and the whole idea of them can be traced back to at least the middle-ages, and originally referred to the legendary Twelve Peers at Charlemagne's court, and to the knights of the round table from Arthurian mythology.
As for "Warrior" .... that concept has existed for at least as long as written history.
Can't wait for Dynasty Warriors (Samurai Warriors? One of em) to get in on this, since they have a person who draws magical attacks with a paintbrush too!
Gonna be a paintbrush free for all.
I explain for the one billion trillion quintillion millionth time XD
Warrior and Paladin are in the creative "Commons" so they can be used by anyone because copyright expire and turn into creative commons after a long time. Artist is not though since it's "New", so it isn't creative "Commons" yet.
Nixon was a president of the United States the game publisher your talking about is nexon and no one owns copyrights to a class in a game that wields a paintbrush. Rem from ff6 used a paintbrush as a weapon maybe square enix should sue nexon if you think someone should get sued.
Why is there 12 pages over this nonsense?!? (i know it's ironic for me to post this here)
This is pointless.