Dragoons: A Rotation Reborn

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KrystalF

Thanks for the new findings on the weights, glad det is much more valued now.

Since people really like to have different accuracy stats I calculated BiS for 482 to 460 accuracy and also 0 accuracy (extremes require shit accuracy)

BiS
http://pastie.org/private/qpfxgvdvj1hmlkxiwt5tq

Pre T5 with Extremes BiS
http://pastie.org/8614681#1

Pre T5 BiS
http://pastie.org/private/u93gaqcronr969rbbmh8q

Hope this helps some or brings more confusion.

---

Oooo, these links are nice, thanks for the iterations :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Migosha

Thanks a lot Dervy, I was using that spreadsheet (modified for my tastes) from GoogleDocs, but didn't knew there was a scripted version for searching the BiS.
One thing you should update : Allagan Earrings of Maiming are now 16 ACC 8 DET and become much more interesting that way.

---

I knew I missed something. Glad I posted it publicly. I'll change it right now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KrystalF

Thanks for the new findings on the weights, glad det is much more valued now.

Since people really like to have different accuracy stats I calculated BiS for 482 to 460 accuracy and also 0 accuracy (extremes require shit accuracy)

BiS
http://pastie.org/private/qpfxgvdvj1hmlkxiwt5tq

Pre T5 with Extremes BiS
http://pastie.org/8614681#1

Pre T5 BiS
http://pastie.org/private/u93gaqcronr969rbbmh8q

Hope this helps some or brings more confusion.

---

Thanks for this, I'll just link the main post to these.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KrystalF

Thanks for the new findings on the weights, glad det is much more valued now.

Since people really like to have different accuracy stats I calculated BiS for 482 to 460 accuracy and also 0 accuracy (extremes require shit accuracy)

BiS
http://pastie.org/private/qpfxgvdvj1hmlkxiwt5tq

Pre T5 with Extremes BiS
http://pastie.org/8614681#1

Pre T5 BiS
http://pastie.org/private/u93gaqcronr969rbbmh8q

Hope this helps some or brings more confusion.

---

Awesome list. I have access to all of the gear in the BiS 470 accuracy set, so I'll use that to parse my next Coil run next Monday and post the results. I'm going with that set because I've parsed some misses in Turn 4 with 469 accuracy (particularly with Ring of Thorns during the bug aoe phases). Unfortunately, I don't have those logs to post here anymore. If I register any misses (other than snakes/mini-wyverns in T5) I'll have to spend some myth to go up and test the 471/472 accuracy sets the following weeks. Thanks!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KrystalF

Thanks for the new findings on the weights, glad det is much more valued now.

Since people really like to have different accuracy stats I calculated BiS for 482 to 460 accuracy and also 0 accuracy (extremes require shit accuracy)

BiS
http://pastie.org/private/qpfxgvdvj1hmlkxiwt5tq

Pre T5 with Extremes BiS
http://pastie.org/8614681#1

Pre T5 BiS
http://pastie.org/private/u93gaqcronr969rbbmh8q

Hope this helps some or brings more confusion.

---

Interesting to see that no accuracy is only 7-9 dps better than BIS depending on which accuracy you're aiming for.

So overall, what is the better rotation between using only Phlebotomize or using both Fracture and Phlebotomize?
I didn't find the comparison in the guide and it is still a hotly debated topic, especially after the 2.1 changes.

Is there any good on using Holy Lance for pre-T5 BiS? Or it's just for pure Vanity?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Thorauku

Is there any good on using Holy Lance for pre-T5 BiS? Or it's just for pure Vanity?

---

I'd say pure Vanity...Skillspeed is our worst stat

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Resia

So overall, what is the better rotation between using only Phlebotomize or using both Fracture and Phlebotomize?
I didn't find the comparison in the guide and it is still a hotly debated topic, especially after the 2.1 changes.

---

Dude, do people ask this every page?

No more fracture.

H IDC P TTT H TTT P IDC H TTT P TTT

So whats the actual DPS loss if I still use the old rotation of HT-Ph-IR-Dis-CT-TTT-Ht-Ph-TTT-TTT instead of the new rotation of HT-ID-Dis-CT-Ph-TTT-HT-TTT-Ph-ID-Dis-CT-HT-TTT-Ph-TTT?