Rename the spells? or not?

Cure, Cura, Curaga, Curaja

or

Cure, Cure II, Cure III, Cure IV

Curaja is so ugly and isnt Curaga supposed to be AoE only?

also for THM:
Sacrifice, Sacrifira? Sacrifiga! Sacrifija... hooooo

Cure, Cure II, Cura, Cura II, Cura III, Curagajagahagahagajaha

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chardrizard

Curaja is so ugly and isnt Curaga supposed to be AoE only?

also for THM:
Sacrifice, Sacrifira? Sacrifiga! Sacrifija... hooooo

---

Curaga was only exclusively AoE in XI. Due to the system they had in place, they decided to use their normal spell naming system to differentiate between AoE and Single Target. As a Result instead of Cure, Cura, Curaga, Curaja, Curasa, you got Cure, Cure II, Cure III, Curaga, Curaga II.

Personally, I'm in favor of the renaming of the spells since we can toggle AoE on and off. There's no need to use the traditional tags to separate Single and Area in this game. And personally, I think Sacrifija sounds awesome. Also, my favorite spell of all time to say was Banishga. It's just fun. Needs more Scourgra and Scourgaga.

Curaja is also known as Cure 4 in the original final fantasy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lusavari

Needs more Scourgra and Scourgaga.

---

Grateful you didn't say "moar". /overit

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lusavari

Needs more Scourgra and Scourgaga.

---

I love this!!

I think Scourgera and Scourgega might be more applicable when it comes to trying to pronounce those... Although Scourgega sounds like some sort of horrible gum disease or STD...

this is actually a good point, i would prefer Cure > Cura > Curaga > Curaja. Because i can actually imagine npcs referring to them this way, rather than with numbers.

I've always liked the -gas and -agagas and -ajawajjas, they're a bit more creative than I, II, III and so on.