
Originally Posted by
Demon6324236
Something else that I would like to see added, is an inheritance or change of leader system. I have seen many linkshells go under because a leader quits, gets banned, or just has something in real happen that prevents them from ever logging onto that character again. I think in such a case a Shellholder should be able to allow a sack holder to take the shell in their stead, allowing the shell to continue on, while the old leader can take their leave. In the case of inheritance, a leader can mark a player in the linkshell as a 2nd in command. They would not be a sack, or shell-holder, however they would be the same as a sackholder except for 1 exception. If a linkshell leader is not present in the linkshell for 30 days in a row, the linkshell itself is passed to the inheritor. If no inheritor is marked, it goes to a sackholder who has been a sackholder for the longest period of time. This way no shell must ever disband, or reform, simply because the loss of their leader.