Salvage Server Exploit needs addressing ASAP

[Alhanelem]

Nothing more cut and dried. They choose to make it a process. That process is unnecessary.

Drop a GM in Dho Gates, I'll give them a personal tour, we'll ban 100 bots in 10 minutes. So simple. Anyone who is actually watching their bot and complains about getting Gaol'd can be set free. The ones that don't, insta ban, no 3 days.

I mean, that process may be unnecssary to you, but clearly it isn't to them.
your steamroller method is likely to pick up non RMT in the crossfire, and SE clearly isn't willing to take t hat risk. They have their process because they don't want anyone to be banned without 100% confirmation of a violation. And unfortunately, they decide that on an individual basis.

And NGL, I could probably do the exact same thing as you, as quite frankly I might argue that one or two semi-possibly-innocent people is a small price to pay to smack down a bunch of bots in one swoop.

The problem is, those bots will come back, the real players probably won't. It's a game of whack-a-mole you can't win, even with a considerably more efficient process.

[Voidstorm]

And NGL, I could probably do the exact same thing as you, as quite frankly I might argue that one or two semi-possibly-innocent people is a small price to pay to smack down a bunch of bots in one swoop.

Acceptable losses vs one innocent wrongly convicted makes you guilty as well.
My view tends to be toward the latter, but when emotion kicks in, the former looks so terribly appealing.

[Alhanelem]

Acceptable losses vs one innocent wrongly convicted makes you guilty as well.
My view tends to be toward the latter, but when emotion kicks in, the former looks so terribly appealing.

I agree. Plus if the salvage bans of the olden days are any indication, one innocent ban would spark massive outrage.

[Arven]

I mean, that process may be unnecssary to you, but clearly it isn't to them.
your steamroller method is likely to pick up non RMT in the crossfire, and SE clearly isn't willing to take t hat risk. They have their process because they don't want anyone to be banned without 100% confirmation of a violation. And unfortunately, they decide that on an individual basis.

And NGL, I could probably do the exact same thing as you, as quite frankly I might argue that one or two semi-possibly-innocent people is a small price to pay to smack down a bunch of bots in one swoop.

The problem is, those bots will come back, the real players probably won't. It's a game of whack-a-mole you can't win, even with a considerably more efficient process.

I see u in every post defending SE, what's your problem?

[Pixela]

I see u in every post defending SE, what's your problem?

Grow up - 10 chars

[Arven]

Grow up - 10 chars

Speak clearly I don't understand your comment.

[Pixela]

Speak clearly I don't understand your comment.

I'm stating you're acting like a child, the "10 chars" part is due to the forum not allowing you to post a comment below 10 characters.

It's not "defending the company" it's just making a argument that makes sense. If you have an argument to make, make it. If someone offers an opinion against you, then refute them if you can.

Don't just fall back on "stop defending the company and refuting my hysterical posts!", it's not a virtue to attack the company that makes the game you're playing.

[Arven]

I'm stating you're acting like a child, the "10 chars" part is due to the forum not allowing you to post a comment below 10 characters.

It's not "defending the company" it's just making a argument that makes sense. If you have an argument to make, make it. If someone offers an opinion against you, then refute them if you can.

Don't just fall back on "stop defending the company and refuting my hysterical posts!", it's not a virtue to attack the company that makes the game you're playing.

First of all we are not attacking the company, We want them to to pay more attention to a subscription based online game, and clean the game from bots.
that's all, thank you for being respectulful dear.

[Alhanelem]

I see u in every post defending SE, what's your problem?

I'm not defending SE, I'm merely accepting reality. And the reality is, they don't do things the way you would want to and I don't see that as likely to change. Certainly not by spamming the boards with screencaps of STF reports.

I want it to change as much as you do, but your method to promote change is guaranteed less effective than simply complaining about it.