Too bad the statement was undercut, not undercut to the point of no profit. If it were the latter, your point would be redundant and stupid.
You said the choice to make or not make a staff does not depend on whether the staff is situational or not. It does.Quote:
I'm not sure what you're saying here, but it sure doesn't have to do with whether something is situational or not.
Terra's for Idle/PDT, Swords or Dagger for when RDMs need to en-melee certain NMs, and Plutos for resting. Still situational even if you combine the Avatar, Damage, and Magic Accuracy staff into one staff. BAM!Quote:
[B]HAH! Here's where you failed to throw my logic right back at me, because your statement makes no sense! If you could combine all of the staves you neeed into one, it would no longer be situational, because you would not still need more than one of those staves. By my logic, that means it's NOT situational! BAM!
NOT situational = Something that is good all-around, and does not need to be swapped out for something else.
situational = something that is useful but does not cover all the bases and must be swapped for another item when a specific situation calls for it.
Too bad that's not the component of your argument I'm at conflict with. Your argument contains several point, the most relevant being that 1) SE wants you to choose between gear 2) Staffs are situation 3) SE makes gear situational so that you'll choose to carry some pieces and not others at given times. From this, you inductively argue that SE will not combine staffs because they want to maintain 3 and the only way to do so is to keep players from choosing to carry one piece over another. My counter is that Magian staffs are likely the last piece of gear a player is going to give up when choosing which pieces to carry or not because people often don't do the Magian staffs they'll marginally use. Hence, they won't satisfy (3). If they don't satisfy (3) already, SE can combine them without a problem.Quote:
If you don't have all 8 staves or aren't pursuing all 8, then that simply means you have no need of the situational benefit that the ones you didn't get offer. it doesn't suddenly strip the term "situational" from the list of words that would describe them.
