They took the JP button away when they added Abyssea. They didn't announce it, but they did it. It's really all we could ask for, now any favoritism is just throwing them a bone.
Printable View
They took the JP button away when they added Abyssea. They didn't announce it, but they did it. It's really all we could ask for, now any favoritism is just throwing them a bone.
should have played phantasy star universe... they were so blatant with japanese favoritism the entire us population spoke out against it and our servers were promptly shut down
I dont think the point is whether or not we like the game or not because either way it wouldnt matter because that still would get ignored in favor of the input of other countries. The argument could be made that if SE put a poll asking just that "Do you enjoy the game?" as you proposed that even with 100,000 NA users voting YES and only like 20,000 JA users voting NO this game would effectively be shut down bc of JA input being more valued than the NA forums. The fact that you cant pick up on that is beyond me. Even if a person likes a game that doesnt mean that arent things one feel can make the game even better than before. No game developed is ever perfect but that doesnt mean that depsite its imperfections that people dont like it. In addition just because a game is imperfect doesnt mean you should sit around and accept it and not try to improve upon it. For people with low self-esteem this concept of not settling may be hard to grasp but effort should definitely be made. LOL
Always been like that for SEGA. Teams are not even working together and server are separated for a reason. However you cannot say that JP had it all on PSU, they had Guardian Cash while SEGA didn't implement it on our side because NA/EU players were hostile to microtransactions. Servers got then shut down due to the lack of revenue in NA/EU, that's about it.
Now back to XI, what people have a hard time to understand is that even if there is less voters on the JP forum, subscription wise, JP players are still the biggest part of the pie. Hence why SE is more listening to them, rather than EU/NA.
Just deal with it. If subscription breakdown was 70% NA/EU vs 30% JP, things would be different.
http://www.sweetslyrics.com/images/i...ryz_Koubou.jpg
...
...
...
...
That creepy image contributed nothing to this topic, but I could not resist. Feel the stare of a half-dozen women dressed as twelve year old girls burn into you.
yeah I somehow doubt JPN subs outnumber all other regions combined.
Not going to lie...I started looking for a picture of a Idol dressed as a ten-year-old, but any image I could find with pig-tails or any other symbol of prepubescence contained too much nudity for this forum. After a while, I felt too creeped out to continue and settled for middle-school uniforms.
Looks to me like people have been confusing opinion polls for votes.
I was just looking at that. WTF is fellow TV? I hope that is some fan produced thing cause if they are spending dev money on that garbage someone needs to burned at the stake.
I voted for ruszor i was quite surprised it didnt win im guessing not enough ppl have fought a real ruszor (lolsedna dosent count) but seeing as the vote didnt matter guess it was for the best.
I suggest to Mod, next time you want player to vote, PLEASE MAKE POLL TOPICS! that make everyone any lanauge can vote on the same poll.
and limited it 1 vote per 1 account that will reflex real need form all player all server, since we any lanauge all play on same server so it's mostly fair to just use same poll. so it's will be fair play, not just say "since group 1 want A, group 2 want B, group 3 want C, group 4 want A so is A win", no matter how many vote was count in each group... since 1+4 may only total 20 vote for all and B may 150 vote... and you hope ppl who vote for B will just accept...
Actually i'm not vote for Scrop, i vote for ruzor, and I think Hippo is not bad at all form i try, but i think it's just not fair to use this way to poll.
I agree with this priority and its BS. FFXIV is still crap and if they were to do a overhaul of anything it should be FFXIV should just be new area's for FFXI. Like an upgrade and or expantion into one game that needs to be unlocked and not used by PS2 players. Either way I'm sure with the number of responses that come from the english forums this game should cater to NA over any other region. I barley see JP players on anymore (at least in Valefor) And im on normally during JP primetime playing.
It's really not still crap, it has greatly improved and is still improving, just like FFXI. Play FFXI at its japanese launch, I guarantee you'd have found it crap.Quote:
FFXIV is still crap
Wow, when did we become so entitled, anyway? You're asking SE to prioritize you over its own market where it's based? And who would have thunk that fans of FFXI would want them to prioritize their game over some other game? This is a totally, TOTALLY unbiased, reasonable viewpoint...
Square Enix is a Japanese company. Why should they prioritize us over their own people? In all actuality, nobody should be prioritized, we should all be treated equally.
Hurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
ITT: Bias in feedback is bad.
Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrp
Yes, bias in feedback IS bad. Apparently we think we're better than the Japanese, for no reason in particular. What we want is what matters and what they want doesn't.
As someone who is normally quite objective, I'm suprised to see you make such a silly and irrelevant comment.
You're skipping steps. Bias in feedback is fine. It's something statisticians and marketing professionals who are worth half a crap already account for when compiling market data. Trying to remove your bias as a member of a polled market actually makes them overcompensate in their data and assume people are happy where they are not.
The issue is not one of perceived superiority, but rather one of perceived partiality. Companies have to make a conscious decision concerning their image when they do things like this. It's not unreasonable for an ancillary (though powerful) market to be upset when they are being treated inequitably by development staff. Do they necessarily have to care? Nah. But that doesn't make it unreasonable for people to be upset. People have every reason to be upset, and if SE's marketing division has any idea what they're doing (I know, they really really don't, but pretend they do), then they'd have already accounted for people being upset before making the decision and chose to proceed with it anyways.
Right, but whether or not the percieved partiality is accurate or not, people want them to be partial to us instead of partial to their own home market.Quote:
but rather one of perceived partiality.
Instead of wanting them to be partial to us or them, people should be wanting it to be fair and equal. I don't have a problem with people being upset, but you ask for equality, not inverse discrimination.
I don't see any of that in the OP or in the conversations in this thread I partook in. The reason for this thread's creation was due to an imbalance, rather than wanting the balance in our favor. Voting is all fine and dandy. Ignoring votes gets people upset. I doubt most people here want SE to turn around and ignore the JP base. I certainly don't. But if they're going to ask for an international poll, I'd appreciate it if they did us the courtesy of counting our results.