Current Limit Break Quest *95*

the other threads there so people can post anything not listed already trying to get as big of a list as possible. at no point did i ever claim the info was mine i cited the sorces for the info and made this thread in hopes people would A. read it and B. post any other items found *and some did but thats been lost in the pissing contest*

your doing more to hurt the community then help it alhanelem. attacking any thread regardless of how good the info is because you dont like the poster or the source is idiotic

and when have i said i was an authority figure on the info lol. ive just been doing my best to keep it up to date and when i can i link the info to wiki pages so people have an even easier to find list of what drops were.

Quote:

---

your doing more to hurt the community then help it alhanelem. attacking any thread regardless of how good the info is because you dont like the poster or the source is idiotic

---

I'm not attacking threads for laughs and giggles. In fact, I'm not attacking the thread itself, only posting my reaction to what I saw. You are once again being rude and insulting. I didn't accuse you of plagarizing, so I don't know why you're being defensive like that.

has a single post of yours in that thread pertained to the point of that thread? If yes and you have further not listed items to add please post it , if NO please leave the tread alone.

simple enough.

Quote:

---

has a single post of yours in that thread pertained to the point of that thread?

---

Yes, it has. It doesn't have to be an addition to the list of items to be relevant to the topic. So please stop trying to give me orders.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alhanelem

Yes, it has. It doesn't have to be an addition to the list of items to be relevant to the topic. So please stop trying to give me orders.

---

You havent done one thing to be helpful in this thread. What have you done besides cause a crap storm over nothing?

"Hey guys, im here to share some info from a credible source" "LULZ U DIDNT FOUND IT URSELFZ, ITS NOT TRU"

if your going to quote please quote the whole post im being very civil with you , and you seem to refuse to afford the same.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gokku

if your going to quote please quote the whole post im being very civil with you , and you seem to refuse to afford the same.

---

Quote:

---

What he's saying is that you need to mention that fact in the post. Your list makes it look as if you need all of those items, not just one of them.

---

This post was intended to be helpful. I made a mistake and missed an important word in the OP, but in handling the issue (you did improve the post) you were extremely rude about it, . I absolutely am affording you civility. I have not been making personal stabs at you.

Rearden, you have just crossed the line.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alhanelem

Rearden, you have just crossed the line.

---

Is that why you deleted his posts?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greatguardian

Is that why you deleted his posts?

---

Aren't you the funny one.

He just knows his posts contained personal attacks/libel/slander/whatever so he just deleted them in a creative way to try defame me further.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alhanelem

First hand experience, where it is reasonably possible, is much better than just referring to something else, especially when the information source post appeared to be questionable at first. It wouldn't have mattered if the post linked was on any other site.

---

That's illogical. The probability of a person lying about first hand experience is going to be equal to someone reporting on another individual's findings to the extent that the reporter is sincere about their report (To avoid the "Telephone" effect). Since it's cited, the problem aforementioned is not present.