Dear Devs: Macro Command - Wait

[Abadacchus]

I definitely agree, with "/wait" requiring its own line there is a huge limitation on what you can do with macros. When I first saw how big the input box was I was so excited at the long strings of commands I thought I would be able to input. Nope, 15 lines max, and half of those are going to be used with "/wait". What a waste of potential that the <wait#> format could alleviate!

[xSinful_Snake]

I'm glad I'm not the only one who realizes the potential of the macro function. Aside from the "/wait #", I don't really see any other problems with the commands. Fix this ONE issue Devs and you'll have happy players with 15 fun lines of command.

Though if you can't add the command "<wait #>", at least consider giving us an additional 7-8 lines of commands to make up for the /wait lines or nullify /wait from counting towards the 15 line-limitation counter.

[Laraul]

I definitely agree, with "/wait" requiring its own line there is a huge limitation on what you can do with macros. When I first saw how big the input box was I was so excited at the long strings of commands I thought I would be able to input. Nope, 15 lines max, and half of those are going to be used with "/wait". What a waste of potential that the <wait#> format could alleviate!

You forget that a macro is limited to 180 characters also (including new line characters). That's an average of 12 characters per line if you use all 15 lines. So forget about having 15 lines of long strings of text. Honestly though, I doubt anyone could find use for all 15 lines.