Seriously, they are KNOWN offenders. Run a trace to your World Servers and see if cogentco shows up in your route just before it starts hitting Ormuco... if you see cogentco, that is likely a major player in this problem. If it isn't Cogent, but someone else and you see a similar pattern as what shows in the following trace logs, research those IP addresses or FQDN names to find out who is responsible and if they too have been documented for having lossy routing.
Here's a post from a Blizzard thread from about a year ago, titled "Lagspikes and the damn atlas.cogentco.com":Tracing route to 199.91.189.74 over a maximum of 30 hops
<<First few hops removed for security reasons>>
5 31 ms 30 ms 30 ms bu-ether14.atlngamq46w-bcr00.tbone.rr.com [66.109.6.82]
6 29 ms 27 ms 27 ms ae-0-0.pr0.atl20.tbone.rr.com [66.109.6.171]
7 77 ms 78 ms 79 ms te0-0-0-10.ccr21.atl02.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.12.109]
8 77 ms 80 ms 81 ms be2052.mpd21.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.40.249]
9 86 ms 91 ms 90 ms te0-0-0-7.mpd21.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.28.197]
10 107 ms 96 ms 93 ms te0-1-0-7.ccr21.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.1.234]
11 122 ms 114 ms 123 ms be2108.ccr21.ymq02.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.3.134]
12 78 ms 68 ms 69 ms 38.122.42.34
13 68 ms 68 ms 68 ms 10.2.2.1
14 69 ms 69 ms 69 ms 192.34.76.2
15 73 ms 68 ms 78 ms 199.91.189.234
16 68 ms 69 ms 69 ms 199.91.189.74
Trace complete.
http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/6794352287
There are additional posts in there that help to further emphasize the scope of the problem. This isn't an isolated incident either. If you spend some time googling, you will see it is a common problem. Players getting routed through Cogentco frequently have issues.Location: Australia
ISP: TPG
Problem: Ridiculous lag spikes
Trace route when normal:
Tracing route to 184.254.129.12.in-addr.arpa [12.129.254.184]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 1.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa [192.168.1.1]
2 19 ms 15 ms 14 ms 49.21.20.10.in-addr.arpa [10.20.21.49]
3 20 ms 15 ms 15 ms 220-244-137-61.tpgi.com.au [220.244.137.61]
4 15 ms 15 ms 30 ms syd-nxg-men-crt1-ge-7-1-0.tpgi.com.au [202.7.162.105]
5 187 ms 197 ms 187 ms te8-3.ccr01.sjc05.atlas.cogentco.com [38.122.92.41]
6 184 ms 185 ms 185 ms te0-3-0-2.mpd22.lax01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.25.189]
7 185 ms 185 ms 186 ms te4-4.ccr02.lax05.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.82.162]
8 184 ms 183 ms 196 ms att.lax05.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.11.10]
9 188 ms 186 ms 186 ms cr1.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.84.202]
10 183 ms 185 ms 191 ms gar20.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.128.181]
11 203 ms 187 ms 184 ms 12-122-254-238.attens.net [12.122.254.238]
12 184 ms 184 ms 184 ms mdf001c7613r0004-gig-10-1.lax1.attens.net [12.129.193.250]
Trace route when lagging: (see underlined)
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 1.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa [192.168.1.1]
2 15 ms 14 ms 15 ms 49.21.20.10.in-addr.arpa [10.20.21.49]
3 30 ms 15 ms 15 ms 220-244-137-61.tpgi.com.au [220.244.137.61]
4 19 ms 14 ms 15 ms syd-nxg-men-crt1-ge-7-1-0.tpgi.com.au [202.7.162.105]
5 177 ms 203 ms 207 ms te8-3.ccr01.sjc05.atlas.cogentco.com [38.122.92.41]
6 185 ms 185 ms 185 ms te0-3-0-2.mpd22.lax01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.25.189]
7 382 ms 209 ms * te4-4.ccr02.lax05.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.82.162]
8 189 ms 183 ms 196 ms att.lax05.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.11.10]
9 187 ms 186 ms 187 ms cr2.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.84.218]
10 182 ms 183 ms 186 ms gar29.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.129.241]
11 187 ms 184 ms 196 ms 12-122-254-234.attens.net [12.122.254.234]
12 184 ms 184 ms 184 ms mdf001c7613r0004-gig-10-1.lax1.attens.net [12.129.193.250]
Tracing route to 184.254.129.12.in-addr.arpa [12.129.254.184]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 1.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa [192.168.1.1]
2 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms 49.21.20.10.in-addr.arpa [10.20.21.49]
3 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms 220-244-137-61.tpgi.com.au [220.244.137.61]
4 23 ms 15 ms 15 ms syd-nxg-men-crt1-ge-7-1-0.tpgi.com.au [202.7.162.105]
5 365 ms 208 ms 207 ms te8-3.ccr01.sjc05.atlas.cogentco.com [38.122.92.41]
6 193 ms 185 ms 184 ms te0-3-0-2.mpd22.lax01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.25.189]
7 * 185 ms 185 ms te4-4.ccr02.lax05.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.82.162]
8 183 ms 183 ms 202 ms att.lax05.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.11.10]
9 211 ms 186 ms 187 ms cr2.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.84.218]
10 277 ms 206 ms 199 ms gar29.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.129.241]
11 185 ms 184 ms 184 ms 12-122-254-238.attens.net [12.122.254.238]
12 184 ms 184 ms 184 ms mdf001c7613r0004-gig-10-1.lax1.attens.net [12.129.193.250]
The thing is, this isn't the first time, and it's not rare to happen at all either. It's been happening for years and whenever it gets resolved, same thing happens again in a few months.
Notice the extended response times for JUST the cogentco segments. This is a very typical thing when passing through their segments. If you spend some time researching their routing, you will quickly see a pattern of them being reported for having high packet loss, and it gets progressively worse during peak traffic windows.
Edit:
**It should be noted, that I don't generally have lag issues in game. So, my response times may be considerably low compared to some of you guys having real issues. What you are looking for is the marked change in one particular segment where response time gets really high (possibly with some time outs), then drops really low again. This is where there is potentially a networking issue that needs to be investigated.**
Cogent has about a dozen or so routers in Quebec, and a bunch of them are in/around Montreal. They are frequently reported for having high loss rates--consistently in excess of 25%. There have been numerous complaints posted about them in various forums over the years.
Please... if you guys are serious about getting this resolved for you, run traces to your world servers (can get the IP's via something like netstat or TCPView). Regardless of what they show, if you are experiencing these high lag/connectivity issues, then copy/paste your results into notepad or something and forward the log to BOTH your ISP and SE when you request assistance from them. Our best hope at resolving at least this fixable aspect of the communications problems is to get the right people leaning on the people responsible for such faltering network segments between us and SE.
After THAT gets resolved, if the problem still persists, then we can start leaning on SE for further tweaking, as we will have proven it is NOT an ISP issue (be it our ISP, SE's ISP, or a segment between us) because we will be able to show a quick, responsive route between the endpoints.
I can't stress this enough. Until we can rule out such issues with interconnectivity, everyone will keep pointing fingers at each other (SE and ISP), and NOTHING will be done to resolve these actual networking problems. If we get a little proactive instead of just b*tching about the lag, we might actually start working towards solving this problem for you guys.