random Duty Finder groups - Square Enix attitude solution INC

[KaiKatzchen]

Stuff

Stuff

My over all point is why reward people who are mean/rude players in the first place for keeping their bad attitudes in place. It's like telling a child who's throwing a temper tantrum "hey if you stop throwing a fit I'll give you a piece of candy". Now the child know's anytime they want something they just throw a fit and they will be placated with treats.

While the child who is already being good and helpful and controlling themselves is ignored.

I don't like this whole points idea at all. SE just needs to stand up and say "Look if you're gonna be this way and you're reported and it's found to be true (SE can see everything going on in these things and pull up everything that was said and that happened) then you will get strikes on your account and if you get 'X' amount of strikes then your account can't enter DF for 'x' amount of days.

Stop giving 'treats' to bad people to get them to be good, and deal with them properly.

[Crica]

the child who is already being good and helpful and controlling themselves is ignored

First of all, EVERYONE who plays nice with random strangers will get the points, so no, they are not ignored

And secondly, SE will NEVER have the manpower or resources to play "mommy" to half a million OR MORE players in the constant turnover that is the Duty Finder

the only way they have to deal with it is to give out something that ppl want bad enough to actually play nice with random strangers in order to get it

i wish them all the luck in the world figuring out what that "something" is, cuz i have no idea!

nor does most of humanity, otherwise there would be no wars and there would be peace in all of the world...

[Aicasia]

Terrible idea, flawed in its very conception as many others have pointed out. Putting rewards in place is one of its biggest design flaws for sure.

[Alhanelem]

Exactly, no one needs an incentive to be a good and polite player, so why does SE feel it is a good idea to bribe rude and mean players into being good? I think it is very sad that this community is so bad, player wise, that this has even come about.

Actually, no. Some people enjoy being turds and DO need an incentive to not be one. It has to be more profitable for them than the entertainment value of being toxic.

[EmeraldSerenade]

This sounds... Completely stupid and meaningless.

This doesn't solve any problems at all.

[makii]

Yes, make the game into reddit 2.0.
Splendid idea..

[Zfz]

Indeed there's no clarification on the number of votes we get. Although I don't read translations. I read the original. And it was worded like this:

"This person is the MVP." (Emphasis mine.)

It wasn't that "this person is a MVP", so I read it as that you only get to choose one from the whole party.

But of course that may be reading too far, or it may just be a mis-representation, or even it may change in the end.

[Ruminate]

So it could go either way. Well, here's to hoping its 1 vote per party member system.

[Pathetic]

this system would be exploit to hell. pple who seek mutual benefit would just vote each other up and trend would follow.Willing to vote up for you if you willing to vote up for me mind set.Had nothing to do with being nice lol.

[Alerith]

I don't know where people are getting this "Only tanks and healers would get upvotes." I've met plenty of players who are pretty bad at both, and we barely scrape by in the run thanks to a DPS spectacularly finishing the boss off in time.

Speaking as a Paladin main: Tanks and Healers are not infallible and there are some pretty horrific players playing them for fast queues. I'll gladly give my upvotes to a worthy DD.