Look at this! o.o Please kick function soon :/

[Mcshiggs]

Seen this happen, sent a ticket, got a response that in there is no policy that states how a player decides to fill their role in the duty finder, and anyone is free to engage or not engage any enemy as they see fit.

[CyrilLucifer]

Seen this happen, sent a ticket, got a response that in there is no policy that states how a player decides to fill their role in the duty finder, and anyone is free to engage or not engage any enemy as they see fit.

I honestly cannot express in words the feeling of disgust I got after I read that response.

[Tsunenori]

Seen this happen, sent a ticket, got a response that in there is no policy that states how a player decides to fill their role in the duty finder, and anyone is free to engage or not engage any enemy as they see fit.

I had this response too when I encountered an AFKer in a dungeon and reported it. They did at least say that they would investigate, but the official stance on it was more or less exactly what you said.

[Benzareli]

Seen this happen, sent a ticket, got a response that in there is no policy that states how a player decides to fill their role in the duty finder, and anyone is free to engage or not engage any enemy as they see fit.

I've gotten the same response. In-action does not fall under griefing, no matter how outrageous the consequence.

[Avengedangel]

Seen this happen, sent a ticket, got a response that in there is no policy that states how a player decides to fill their role in the duty finder, and anyone is free to engage or not engage any enemy as they see fit.

Got this too. ._.