Look at this! o.o Please kick function soon :/

[Smayocat]

1 How was the boss aggro without the person inside getting attacked
2 that add doesn't pop up until she is at about 25%
This was most likely a bug and not at all the players fault.

Problem is the guy has been standing there for tens of minutes, if you look at screen shot one and the screen shot underneath it, you'll see that the person has been standing there forever. So you're saying it isn't the players fault for standing there doing nothing for tens of minutes, when they could die, respawn and resume the encounter?

[RinoaHeartilly]

1 How was the boss aggro without the person inside getting attacked
2 that add doesn't pop up until she is at about 25%
This was most likely a bug and not at all the players fault.

Not the whole party gets aggro, only the ones attacking or healing.

[ZakarnRosewood]

I kinda like the Honor/Tribunal system in LoL. It helps weed out toxic players from queuing up with people. They will be adding in a MVP voting system soon where the MVP of a dungeon will get a bonus. I hope this will help encourage people to preform well for the bonus instead of being a dick cause they can get away with it. We shall see.

[Mcshiggs]

Seen this happen, sent a ticket, got a response that in there is no policy that states how a player decides to fill their role in the duty finder, and anyone is free to engage or not engage any enemy as they see fit.

[CyrilLucifer]

Seen this happen, sent a ticket, got a response that in there is no policy that states how a player decides to fill their role in the duty finder, and anyone is free to engage or not engage any enemy as they see fit.

I honestly cannot express in words the feeling of disgust I got after I read that response.

[Tsunenori]

Seen this happen, sent a ticket, got a response that in there is no policy that states how a player decides to fill their role in the duty finder, and anyone is free to engage or not engage any enemy as they see fit.

I had this response too when I encountered an AFKer in a dungeon and reported it. They did at least say that they would investigate, but the official stance on it was more or less exactly what you said.

[Benzareli]

Seen this happen, sent a ticket, got a response that in there is no policy that states how a player decides to fill their role in the duty finder, and anyone is free to engage or not engage any enemy as they see fit.

I've gotten the same response. In-action does not fall under griefing, no matter how outrageous the consequence.

[Avengedangel]

Seen this happen, sent a ticket, got a response that in there is no policy that states how a player decides to fill their role in the duty finder, and anyone is free to engage or not engage any enemy as they see fit.

Got this too. ._.

[jcw005]

It was clearly a conscious decision on S-E's part not to implement a kick functionality, which frankly speaking, is ridiculous. It's fine if they don't want to encourage bullying; I get that. But that official response clearly shows they don't care in the least about what would be legitimate uses of kick functionality either.