Duty Finder Kick Vote

[SeleneVenizelos]

I would like to petition the addition of a kicking system to Duty Finder; perhaps a kick vote, meaning if seven of the party vote to kick somebody then they are kicked from Duty and also suffer the 15 minute wait.

I am tired of people joining a Duty Finder group, something going wrong, bitching and then spending the rest of their time in that group wiping on purpose, screwing up, generally ruining other people's gameplay. They don't drop because they don't want to wait 15 minutes, meaning somebody else, who isn't being a magnificent so-in-so, has to take the 15 minute hit.

In my opinion, this is quite disgusting.

Some will say it will be abused; the thing is I perceive all seven members voting somebody out for no reason to happen much less than somebody doing what I described above.

So please, SE, add a kick vote to Duty Finder so we don't have to put up with these cretins anymore.

[tbo]

Well making someone suffer 15min for being kicked is a bit whack. But adding a button to kick someone with a vote is great. But being kicked and suffering 15min would suck if people teamed up and just kicked people for fun or other reasons

[SeleneVenizelos]

Well making someone suffer 15min for being kicked is a bit whack. But adding a button to kick someone with a vote is great. But being kicked and suffering 15min would suck if people teamed up and just kicked people for fun or other reasons

The 1000 word limit is silly, so I couldn't elaborate too much, but yeah. This is my only real concern. I'm sure it will be abused and that will suck for anyone on the receiving end. Perhaps there could be other requirements based on tell tale behaviour. In one run a moment ago the Black Mage didn't do any nuking; a Black Mage not nuking is clearly not being a Black Mage.

Perhaps if certain criteria are met once people have voted, they get kicked. I don't know.

I still think the circumstances of a random group of seven people randomly kicking somebody (considering most people in DF are nice, intelligent people) would be very low; whereas I have had people intentionally ruining runs several times now.

[Fuz]

I'm against it. It will be abused for sure.
I prefer to leave the group and suffer a 15 minutes debuff, which isn't that much.

[Cairn]

A group of three friends decided to make a party and apply for four men instance via Duty finder.
At the end of the battle, one of them want the loot from the chest so they kick vote player "A".
Player "A" got kicked out the party and suffer for 15 minutes wait.

[ReplicaX]

A group of three friends decided to make a party and apply for four men instance via Duty finder.
At the end of the battle, one of them want the loot from the chest so they kick vote player "A".
Player "A" got kicked out the party and suffer for 15 minutes wait.

"Error: Player can not be kicked when loot is in pool."

[Cairn]

"Error: Player can not be kicked when loot is in pool."

Okay, before they open the chest...

[RoosterAgathos]

So someones gets together 7 like minded jerks together. Once the prize is won they kick the 8th to ensure their team gets the drop.

[Ihm]

Why is it that people are very against the potential to group up and kick someone, but are perfectly fine with people sitting in a run not participating or ruining the run because they want to abuse it to soulbind gear. Why is one not fair but the other is?

I support this completely, had enough of dealing with people sitting their in my runs not doing anything.

[FinagleABagel]

No. Potential for abuse and trolling is way too high.