SCH... are we used?

[Tremara]

I don´t know ... atm I would say the SCH is the better AoE-healer because of less hate and better gaining MP.
If I would cast 2 Medika I/II right after another, the boss would great me with 5k hit right in the face - and if I am not dead after that I lost 1.1k MP. My friend who is playing SCH has no problems with hate at all - and he don´have to worry about MP.
Yeah, WHM has the enmity-reduce/gain MP-Skill but sometimes 2min cool down are just too much.

PS: Yes, I am exaggerating but it´s more or less that way - at least for me.

[kronpas]

I don´t know ... atm I would say the SCH is the better AoE-healer because of less hate and better gaining MP.
If I would cast 2 Medika I/II right after another, the boss would great me with 5k hit right in the face - and if I am not dead after that I lost 1.1k MP. My friend who is playing SCH has no problems with hate at all - and he don´have to worry about MP.
Yeah, WHM has the enmity-reduce/gain MP-Skill but sometimes 2min cool down are just too much.

PS: Yes, I am exaggerating but it´s more or less that way - at least for me.

Your tanks are doing terrible job if you pull threat after 2 AOE heals.

how? whm do just as well as sch well that fight perhaps even better . Sch is the one that lacks aoe healing and needs to spam the hell out of succor to make up for it.

WHM is better as it makes up for DPS incompetency better (spam medica away!). If they do their job properly you dont have to heal as much.

[fanservice]

WHM is better as it makes up for DPS incompetency better (spam medica away!). If they do their job properly you dont have to heal as much.

This right here is exactly why I found AV easier than most AK groups as a SCH. I get dps that take the liquify lines on top of the usual 300-400 murder holes hitting random people. It's not like SCH are good at fixing their group damage problems in a single spellcast...