Is Dungeon XP really that bad?

[Raansu]

Well people say fates are best, but im lv 44 and doing a fate gives me like 10k XP with gold, but when i went to the lv 41 and 44 dungeons i was getting 1.4k XP per mob, mobs are ing roups of 3-4 so that's 4-5k XP per mob group that takes a few mins to kill, the fact you can kill these constantly all the way through the dungeon seems pretty good.

Now i tried to lv on fates on the snow zone and i was stood for 5 min waiting for one, then if i could get to it in time and get gold/silver id get 10k in 5-10 min, so are dungeons really as bad as people think? because from where im sat it seems dungeons are much faster and more enjoyable and constant...

Yes its bad. Dungeon xp should be increased. I actually tried a fate group today and within 30 minutes I got over 200k xp. In the hour it took to do the 47 dungeon I got 96k xp. To me this is just pure BS. Not only are the fates boring as hell, the xp from them is just insane. Either lower the fate xp or increase the dungeon xp. Me personally I'd like to see the dungeon xp increased. Encourages more people to use the duty finder and dungeons in general are just way more fun.

[Govalon]

Yes its bad. Dungeon xp should be increased

Oh.. just no. All xp should be nerfed and FATES the most.

[Raansu]

Sorry but I disagree. Time invested into dungeons should be more rewarding than it currently is with xp.