Finished Economics , now studying Mathematics and had my fair share of insight into reputable banks.
Since I actually have experience from both sides I can tell you that you have no idea about mathematics and if you truly believe your pity models have merit for any scenario other than telling silly Economics undergraduates that people will buy less crap if the price goes up and similar then you either only very recently finished your studies and have missed the point of the degree.
With what information you have now given you have barely even scraped on the surface of the finance world and have at best gone through some spreadsheets or powerpoint presentations.
You're clearly still green or you wouldn't be holding so dearly to the models of your little degree.
I thank you for stalking me by the way, but I am not here to support anyone, I just find it exceedingly amusing how perfectly you fit into the role of a little economist student who knows and understands shit all even after the completion of their degree.
And lastly, 4/5 (80%) is nothing special , people with such scores won't even be taken at any of the three universities that I have attended or am attending currently. If you managed to average >96% in lolhighschool (I can't believe you're bringing 80% in a single high school exam up, how sad) and manage to maintain >95% in at least economics (you obviously won't be able to pull of mathematics) I might think of being impressed. You'd still be a fool for giving merit to a model that is about as advanced as a traffic light though.
Actually here's some more since I barely even skim your post:
Any "club" or association at university means nothing at all, they take anyone. I've had to deal with complete airheads at such a place during my econ days and boy was it a waste of time. The only good this serves is networking and nothing else.
And the sheer fact you bring up "several econ/finance courses" as if it wasn't a given when studying at an HE institution is quite entertaining as well.


Reply With Quote


