Results 1 to 10 of 278

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    CrimsonJenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    52
    Character
    Seiryn Trueheart
    World
    Leviathan
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 50
    No, they are addressing issues based on priority of severity. And Ninja had a specific stance that improved enmity and lowered damage output not to mention merits that improved enmity of ninjitsu (also inversely had ones that reduced it), they wouldn't have these tools available if they were unintended to have the potential to tank. And it was never intended to be a primary tanking job, It was intended to be a jack of all trades most of the zilart jobs were designed around this concept.

    So you would force others to play in a method to the liking of the masses? Just do it because everyone else does? Fall in line with us or pay? No. Everyone has the right to play the way they want, whether they want to exploit a fate for exp or complete a fate for rewards, we all play the game to have fun and each persons view of fun is different. And SE has a history of failing to address issues even severe ones, its remarkable they even addressed the AK one as fast as they did.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    GordonLiu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Girdania
    Posts
    38
    Character
    Joe Strummer
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by CrimsonJenn View Post
    No, they are addressing issues based on priority of severity. And Ninja had a specific stance that improved enmity and lowered damage output not to mention merits that improved enmity of ninjitsu (also inversely had ones that reduced it), they wouldn't have these tools available if they were unintended to have the potential to tank....
    You are astonishingly stubborn. I love a good debate, but I presented you with actual evidence that shows *the comments that developers left* in reply to the unexpected use of the job. This isn't for you to pick apart, it's for you to read and understand. You can argue that the Earth is flat, and you might make a point that you think sounds good, but once you see the photographs, you have to give it up.

    I'll leave the rest of the content of that post alone, as, much like with this NIN discussion, reality has swooped in and proved you incorrect.
    (1)