Firestarter

[Kuroi_Tsuki]

Am I the only one who thinks that Firestarter is quite lame? I mean, I don't even see a reason someone would use Fire I on 44+ and Firestarter is only triggered by Fire I.

[Lgalang]

Who will use Fire 1 on level 44 you ask???? ALL THE BLM/THM DOES.

[Holyhunter]

Am I the only one who thinks that Firestarter is quite lame? I mean, I don't even see a reason someone would use Fire I on 44+ and Firestarter is only triggered by Fire I.

faster cast time, lower mp cost. Don't tell me you've just been casting fire 3...

[Orophin]

If you've been spamming Fire 3 you're doing it wrong. You use it once to get your full Astral stack then use Fire.

[Yoohre_WildRiver]

tier spells in Final fantasy are not like any other mmo where.. 2 is greater that 1 so i will use 2 from now on..

in FF you use all spells and all tiers! when the moment calls for them

[Kuroi_Tsuki]

guess i'm doing it wrong then.

[shinros]

Lol I personally can't wait for firestarter 3 more levels then it BEGINS.

What level do you get it?

You learn the trait at level 44.

[Rufeo]

Lol I personally can't wait for firestarter 3 more levels then it BEGINS.

What level do you get it?

[Kuroi_Tsuki]

I tried. Looks better. Lol, I guess, thanks for the tip.

[Daemonfaust]

I hope people aren't making the mistake of casting Fire 3 just because it has a higher number than Fire 1. Its an honest mistake though but when you look at the numbers of mp, time casting, and damage, Fire 3 is only worth it during Firestarter procs and to get a full stack of Astral fire while in full stack of Umbral.

I like how they made all the spells have a purpose from 1 - 50 and still be used. Only issue is that the naming is a bit confusing... Fire 1 is single target, Fire 2 is less damage than Fire 1 and AOE, and Fire 3 is single target but doesn't replace the use of Fire 1 due to cast time and mp even though it does more damage. Think they could have worked out some better names.