We need an AH

[Kaedan]

You don't seem to get the fact that because there are subjective reasons for liking the MWs as is, you cannot make the claim that it is objectively better. Objectively better means that your idea is better in all ways for everyone... which it is not.

[Warp]

You don't seem to get the fact that because there are subjective reasons for liking the MWs as is, you cannot make the claim that it is objectively better. Objectively better means that your idea is better in all ways for everyone... which it is not.

You're right, but fortunately SE only cares about the majority, new players, and players that quit. Guess what? They want a proper Auction House.

[Kaedan]

You're right, but fortunately SE only cares about the majority, new players, and players that quit. Guess what? They want a proper Auction House.

Really? Ok, please show me this evidence you have that the majority, all new players, and all players that quit want an AH... also, please show me which kind of AH they all want and proof that they all want that kind of AH.

@Alexia
Yeah I would agree with that, if they did Price History in a responsible manner, I would be ok with it. If they showed average over long periods of time, it would prevent the exploitability of it.

[Mack]

You don't seem to get the fact that because there are subjective reasons for liking the MWs as is, you cannot make the claim that it is objectively better. Objectively better means that your idea is better in all ways for everyone... which it is not.

Well neither are the wards really so this point is moot...but I'm not surprised because most people will blindly defend something they like without looking at the others merits (this includes me as we're all guilty of it, its just starting to get annoying watching the merry go round).