I may be a bit ignorant here, but short of Ruin II costing more mana... why would you choose ruin I over ruin II; short of you running out of mana?
I may be a bit ignorant here, but short of Ruin II costing more mana... why would you choose ruin I over ruin II; short of you running out of mana?
SMN has major mana problems if you want to keep up Thunder, and at 50 Shadow Flare, while maintaining Fester use and never using Energy Drain.
A BRD does rectify this, but SMN has pretty big mana problems for the optimal rotation.
Basically, it boils down to this:
If you have time to use Ruin or Ruin II, use Ruin II only when you need to use an off-GCD skill.
Edit: This is about the ~4-5min mark that you'll start to run low without a BRD. If you ever need to re-summon your pet or battle rez, this problem is greatly exacerbated.
Last edited by Kevee; 09-05-2013 at 12:56 AM.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote



