takecare plasma tv user

[Mailstrum]

L E D enough said

[zenmetsu]

L E D = L C D

enough said

[Mailstrum]

L E D = L C D

enough said

Technically speaking, an LED TV is also an LCD TV, as the screen on both is a liquid crystal display. An LCD display has two layers of glass that are polarized and joined together, the liquid crystals then pass or block the light to display the television picture.

The crystals do not produce any light as the light comes from a series of lamps at the back of the screen. On an LCD TV, the lamps at the back of the screen are fluorescent lamps, whilst on an LED TV the lights at the back of the screen are Light Emitting Diodes (LED).

If you want the best in picture quality among LED TVs, technically it will have to be one that has full-array back lighting with local dimming. The individual zones of LEDs can be dimmed or brightened independently, making it more flexible and suitable to an individual’s taste and preference.

Comparing side by side, LED TVs generally have better black levels and contrasts than their LCD counterparts. Color accuracy is also slightly better on an LED TV

[Talsalus]

L E D = L C D

enough said

Except for the part where LED is way better lol.... not equal at all.

[Mailstrum]

Except for the part where LED is way better lol.... not equal at all.

also LED has an even longer life then LCD and consumes even less energy and gives off even less heat.

[Arminus]

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/55%22+Cl...0LED&cp=1&lp=1

Blows the best on-market Plasma out of the water in multiple room lighting conditions. I've done side by side comparisons in multiple lighting conditions (with both sets fully calibrated with a calibration Blu-ray disc). As have others on various AV forums and AV sites. It also sports the LOWEST input lag of any HDTV on the market. Hands down the best gaming TV on the market right now.

[zenmetsu]

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/55%22+Cl...0LED&cp=1&lp=1

Blows the best on-market Plasma out of the water in multiple room lighting conditions. I've done side by side comparisons in multiple lighting conditions. As have others on various AV forums and AV sites. It also sports the LOWEST input lag of any HDTV on the market. Hands down the best gaming TV on the market right now.

Lulz... that edge-lit POS. Yeah, you can totally see the non-uniformity of the light field, especially with dark scenes.

Try harder.

[Arminus]

Lulz... that edge-lit POS. Yeah, you can totally see the non-uniformity of the light field, especially with dark scenes.

Try harder.

Don't troll. With as against LEDs as you seem to be I guarantee you haven't owned that set. You saw "edge lit" and made an assumption based on that. Unlike you i've actually done comparisons with the actual product. If you don't want to take my word for it then do some actual research on the product yourself. But I doubt you'll bother. Plasma fanboys are amusing. As for LCD vs Plasma, I don't prefer one over the other, I prefer whichever gives me the best picture (all picture quality factors included). Which is why I bought both and did a comparison myself (and then returned the set that had the inferior picture).

[zenmetsu]

Don't troll. With as against LEDs as you seem to be I guarantee you haven't owned that set. You saw "edge lit" and made an assumption based on that. Unlike you i've actually done comparisons with the actual product. If you don't want to take my word for it then do some actual research on the product yourself. But I doubt you'll bother. Plasma fanboys are amusing.

You are correct. I haven't owned that set. I saw that one and the KDL-47W and they both had issues with color saturation with certain viewing angles and they both had issues with fast motion, despite being touted as 400+Hz refresh. Their motion clarifiers tended to over sharpen images on fast moving video.

I am hardly a "plasma fanboi", and I would gladly buy an LCD display once I find one that I am satisfied with. They exist, mind you, but not outside of the $4000 price range. The only advantage that LCD has going for it right now is that the 4K displays are generally LCD only, but then again, there really isn't much in the way of 4K content at the moment.

[Arminus]

You are correct. I haven't owned that set. I saw that one and the KDL-47W and they both had issues with color saturation with certain viewing angles and they both had issues with fast motion, despite being touted as 400+Hz refresh. Their motion clarifiers tended to over sharpen images on fast moving video.

I am hardly a "plasma fanboi", and I would gladly buy an LCD display once I find one that I am satisfied with. They exist, mind you, but not outside of the $4000 price range. The only advantage that LCD has going for it right now is that the 4K displays are generally LCD only, but then again, there really isn't much in the way of 4K content at the moment.

See I didn't personally see any of that in set 900A that I bought. I was comparing it with the Panasonic TC-PZT60 Plasma and of the two, after calibration, the 900A had a noticeably better picture in all of the lighting conditions I set up during my comparisons, and also sported virtually ZERO input lag.