Yeah, it's frustrating. Taking, for example, this row of yours:
258.333333 * .95 * 1 * 1.5 = 368.12500 => 368
It's problematic, because according to the math there, the lowest crit should be 368. But theres a 367 observed crit. So, plugging in the highest value that could round down to 367, we get:
X * .95 * 1 * 1.5 = 367.4999999 => 367
X * .95 = 249.9999999 => 250
X = 257.894736
So, X can't be bigger than that, or we don't see the 367 crit that I saw. But, then, step two of that shows that 257.894736 *.95 only drops to 250, and woudn't show the 245 non-crit I observed.
X * .95 * 1 * 1 = 244.5 => 245 is the lowest value that would allow a 245 non-crit
X = 257.368421 is the lowest X value for a 245 non-crit
X * .95 = 245.4999999 => 245 is the highest value allowing a 245 non-crit
X = 258.421052 is the highest X value
Going back to the critical value. . .
X * .95 * 1.5 = 366.5 => 367 is the lowest value that yields 367
X * .95 = 244.3333333 => 244 (which we know is too low, but hey)
X = 257.192928
So, the actual X value to observe the minimums I have is between 257.368421 and 257.894736. This is the range for the minimums. Let's do the maximums.
269.5 < X * 1.05 < 270.4999999
256.666666 < X < 257.619047 Progress, because this upper bound is smaller than the old one.
405.5 < X * 1.05 * 1.5 < 406.4999999
257.460317 < X < 258.095238 And now we have a better lower bound, too. . .
257.460317 < X < 257.619047 These are the boundaries for 100 potency. For 50 potency. . .
Minimums:
122.5 < X * .95 * .5 < 123.4999999
257.894736 < X < 259.999999 Which is out of our boundary for 100 potency. . .
184.5 < X * .95 * .5 * 1.5 < 185.4999999
258.947368 < X < 260.350877
So, 258.947368 < X < 259.999999 for the minimums
Maximums:
135.5 < X * 1.05 * .5 < 136.4999999
258.095238 < X < 259.999999
203.5 < X * 1.05 * .5 * 1.5 < 204.4999999
258.412698 < X < 259.682539
So, the boundaries are:
100 Potency: 257.460317 < X < 257.619047
50 Potency: 258.947368 < X < 259.682539
And there is no overlap between the bounds![]()



Reply With Quote


