Dragoons: A Rotation Reborn

[Ayvar]

Finally got around to adding Krystals lists and the new stat weights from EMX, sorry for the delay. I'll get around to changing the DoT section eventually, haven't decided if I want to just adjust it, erase entirely, or replace with something else.

This is my parser from T5 tonight with 472 accuracy. I hope it will help us to know how much accuracy needed for end game later.
regards

Thank you for this! Very interesting to see misses at 472 since none of the other parses show this, my own included. Now I have to decide if I want to do a low 460's parse tonight, or do a second one at 473. I wish I had multiple Dragoons to run T5 with.

May I ask, and I do apologise if it's been asked multiple times, but which is more accurate for parsing; FFXIV-App or LogRep?

I've been using FFXIV-App for a while now, but I always see LogRep parsings here.

LogRep is just nice for accuracy because it shows almost all of the relevant information on one screen. It gives job, parse duration, what mobs were hit, total damage done on each mob (which shows relatively how much time in the parse was spent actually hitting each mob), and miss % for all

Was wondering what avg DPS should DRG be parsing prior to snakes, anyone have any dps parse data for drg prior to snake phase from T5? Thanks.

It's tough because I always find the parsers inflate my dps, LogRep2 consistently shows me at 350+ dps on T5 and extremes, which is stupid. ACT is probably going to be the best for your personal numbers, I'll try to get an idea of what I'm doing pre-snakes tonight with ACT.

[Peptaru]

Thank you for this! Very interesting to see misses at 472 since none of the other parses show this, my own included. Now I have to decide if I want to do a low 460's parse tonight, or do a second one at 473. I wish I had multiple Dragoons to run T5 with.

When posting misses at that accuracy, I'd much prefer to see it by attack instead of by mob... I had misses at 474 cuz i was jerkin around with RoT, j/s. I always much prefer the "by attack hit %" compared to a flat out hit %.

[Ayvar]

I had misses at 474 cuz i was jerkin around with RoT, j/s. I always much prefer the "by attack hit %" compared to a flat out hit %.

Ahhhh I see. I avoid using AE when parsing on T5 for accuracy, so that's probably why there's that discrepancy between my parses and his. I'll put together a by-ability breakdown when I parse tonight. I'll prolly aim for 463 accuracy then.