3.8 is for the original...not arr...from 2010...:/
3.8 is for the original...not arr...from 2010...:/
It's unfair to rate a game solely based on it's connection problems.
I havent seen end-game yet but I can tell that leveling is a blast
LOL.
The more fun thing are the bad reviews can be resumed as the follow:
"This game sucks cause i want to play it"
Whoops
/10
Last edited by JamesTalon; 09-03-2013 at 01:08 AM. Reason: Didn't realize it was 1.0
and you know there cant be slaughter without laughter.
Agreed. Its because people aren't rational. They are simply mad and felt the need to discredit Square Enix at any opportunity they had. Giving something a 0 because you haven't been able to play due to server issues was very childish of them. Considering to review something without bias you would need to have tried different areas of the game first. So if they couldn't login, then they should have waited till they could. SE has already made it clear they will be fixing the issues this week but of course people can't wait. Its always me me me now now now~ Its silly really.
Are you an internet e-thug?
I laugh cause you fake. CX
um.. op... http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/fi...a-realm-reborn
looks like they are doing decent to me.
How dare people express their opinions with a bad score because they can't play a product they paid for, this game deserves a solid 10, stop being entitled haters.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.