3.8 is for the original...not arr...from 2010...:/

3.8 is for the original...not arr...from 2010...:/

It's unfair to rate a game solely based on it's connection problems.
I havent seen end-game yet but I can tell that leveling is a blast


LOL.
The more fun thing are the bad reviews can be resumed as the follow:
"This game sucks cause i want to play it"

Whoops
/10
Geändert von JamesTalon (03.09.13 um 01:08 Uhr) Grund: Didn't realize it was 1.0

and you know there cant be slaughter without laughter.

Agreed. Its because people aren't rational. They are simply mad and felt the need to discredit Square Enix at any opportunity they had. Giving something a 0 because you haven't been able to play due to server issues was very childish of them. Considering to review something without bias you would need to have tried different areas of the game first. So if they couldn't login, then they should have waited till they could. SE has already made it clear they will be fixing the issues this week but of course people can't wait. Its always me me me now now now~ Its silly really.
Are you an internet e-thug?
I laugh cause you fake. CX

um.. op... http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/fi...a-realm-reborn
looks like they are doing decent to me.



How dare people express their opinions with a bad score because they can't play a product they paid for, this game deserves a solid 10, stop being entitled haters.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie-Richtlinien
Diese Website benutzt Cookies. Wenn du keine Cookies auf deinem Gerät einsetzen möchtest, benutze bitte nicht diese Website. Bitte lies die Square Enix Cookie-Richtlinien für weitere Informationen. Deine Nutzung dieser Website unterliegt außerdem den Nutzungsbedingungen und den Datenschutzrichtlinien der Square Enix-Websites, und indem du diese Website nutzt, akzeptierst du diese Bedingungen. Die Nutzungsbedingungen, Datenschutzrichtlinien und Cookie-Richtlinien lassen sich auch über Links unten auf dieser Website finden.
Zitieren




