


It depends on the person, really.Yeah you did quote me on a very old comment lots more has come to our attention since then.
We should probably be talking now about the angle the hip is and how the pelvis is tilted as a possible easier quick fix to minimize the odd appearance of the side view.
I still believe the appearance of the Female Miquo'te can be better achieved threw other terms.
Also @Tupsi perhaps you should listen to LoLo because she is correct on this matter.
Ravij: ok all I could go by is your join date. You do realize that they took at least a year to respond to this and it was only after being reposted on JP forums?
Last edited by LoLo; 10-07-2013 at 12:04 PM.
True but I guess we just share the same opinions because I see it the way you do.
Sorry, you seem quite narrow minded Tanaya no offense intended of course but this is not only about the but.
Can you not see the extreme over all appearance this change has caused?
Saying 1.0 model is exactly what was intended as the topic because the 1.0 model over all was much nicer looking. The entire body structure, hip position, pelvis, rear, legs it's all different now.
Last edited by Vandark; 10-07-2013 at 12:11 PM.
It's a serious issue when it starts to distract from Japanese perversion ........ I mean immersion. Immersion.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.




