Results 1 to 10 of 832

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Aegis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,161
    Character
    Aegis Elisus
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Armorer Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Vandark View Post
    In the beta the majority agreed with me and in only a day I had over 200 likes but then the beta ended and with it the forums.
    Quote Originally Posted by Vandark View Post
    The majority who posted in my thread in the beta did agree with me, there is nothing wrong with what I said.
    I've highlighted the part where you were intellectually dishonest. Majority of people posting in your thread does not equal the majority of people in the beta.

    And now the majority of people visiting this thread have not agreed with you, as evidenced by the particularly anaemic 'like' count.

    You still haven't responded as to whether you recognise this huge fall in support. Or apologised for mistating the like count on the butt slider in the OP. Or failing to mention in the OP SE's response in beta to the issue of backsides.

    Free speech is a beautiful thing. Misrepresenting facts and neglecting pertinent bits of information when setting out your case is just fundamentally dishonest.

    I'm not going to bump this thread anymore.


    Edit:

    Quote Originally Posted by Vandark View Post
    I never once said the majority in the beta as a whole you are putting words in my mouth.
    Quote Originally Posted by Vandark View Post
    In the beta the majority agreed with me and in only a day I had over 200 likes but then the beta ended and with it the forums.
    /sigh

    Which part of "In the beta the majority agreed with me" was misrepresented?

    Quote Originally Posted by Vandark View Post
    This means I know Yoshi previously turned down the idea of a But Slider but that has nothing to do with what I'm asking for.
    Really, then why include it (and it's associated 'like' count, which you again misrepresented) in your OP? You thought it was related when it was supporting your argument, but now it's taken as evidence against it you are distancing yourself from it. Again, fundamentally dishonest.


    Also, do you acknowledge the huge drop in support?
    (4)
    Last edited by Aegis; 09-02-2013 at 07:35 PM.