If you truly cared so much about appearances you would've noticed they didn't change the models at all.
No, your screenshots are not valid comparisons either when they're not even the same angles or animations.
If you truly cared so much about appearances you would've noticed they didn't change the models at all.
No, your screenshots are not valid comparisons either when they're not even the same angles or animations.
Really?
Compare the size of the heads, Compare the small part above the tail and what surrounds it.
How about another 2.0 side on picture. How can you possibly be ok with the 2.0 body.
The original was small enough as it was but it looked normal still, it didn't need to be non-existent.
There needs to be something there instead of nothing at all, it doesn't look normal otherwise.
Last edited by Vandark; 08-31-2013 at 09:27 AM.
the 2.0 character's back look crooked. I agree that this should be address. And i believe that the department handling model and texture does not have anything to do with server and data centre capabilities
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.