less polygon means harder to make a round shape so this is what became of it.


less polygon means harder to make a round shape so this is what became of it.
Nothing wrong here your just seeing things
Is this a joke thread?
Like I've said many times about the cloths, they used to connect in 1.0 and they should connect in 2.0 also, the reason they don't isn't because there not supposed to be skin tight, it's because the bottom half of the model has been scaled down in size. Also there is a huge difference between something that is skin tight and something that has large missing space.
Why defend something which is clearly an error in its creation your just putting a blind eye towards the fact that our character model for the Miquo'te in 2.0 shares the same upper body as the 1.0 model but for some random reason our 2.0 model has thinner legs, thinner hips, thinner rear and all round from every angle it's scaled down. The legs on my character used to have thickness to them now they look like sticks…
My question to the Dev team would be was this intentional; did they internationally scale down the Female Miquo'te models bottom half of their bodies?
I think this was a mistake when converting the model to 2.0 and they overlooked it.
Thing about body’s is they all have body parts and the but is a body part so why doesn’t my character have a but?
Have youuuu ever seen a real body, did it have a backside, do you know that men don't have hips as large as woman because woman need to give birth?
So why doesn't my “FEMALE” Character have an ass and hips? Those legs too... there like sticks now compared to what they used to be.
Last edited by Vandark; 09-05-2013 at 05:10 PM.





No. I spent the last 4 years at an art school not doing that.
She does. They're just not as oversized as you're accustomed to (Which is kinda a shame, but it's still the base model as 1.0 just less polys). If you think those are man hips, you've never compared the two.So why doesn't my “FEMALE” Character have an ass and hips?
If it's only polys why is the bottom half effected so greatly by it compared to the upper which appears to remain the very close to the same as 1.0, even if it was just the polys that caused this massive change in the body's structure adjustments should have been made to cover it.
Also IMO they were far from oversizeed, they were just proportioned better and IMO it was a normal size and now there is one extream opposite in the lower area and a new extream opposite in the upper area.., you drew pictures of girls with flat asses, tiny hips, broad shoulders with big jugs?.
Last edited by Vandark; 09-01-2013 at 03:57 PM.





Because:If it's only polys why is the bottom half effected so greatly by it compared to the upper which appears to remain the very close to the same as 1.0, even if it was just the polys that caused this massive change in the body's structure adjustments should have been made to cover it.
1. A loss of polys is a loss of curvature. You sacrifice smoothness.
2. The lighting system has changed. We don't get soft highlights detailing more prominent curvature on the skin. The crappy dynamic lighting system can't quite capture the details of the displacement maps.
3. You're exaggerating the difference from over-analysis.
However, we do need an ass slider. That much is true.
Yeah. Girls with small asses exist. And those shoulders are hardly broad for women.Also IMO they were far from oversizeed, they were just proportioned better and IMO it was a normal size and now there is one extreme opposite in the lower area and a new extreme opposite in the upper area.., you drew pictures of girls with flat asses, tiny hips, broad shoulders with big jugs?.
The boob thing however is a result of adding the slider to appeal to the lowest common denominator. Not much can be said about that. It's only disproportional if you choose to make it too big.
I'd settle for having this hairstyle fixed.
![]()
Last edited by Gramul; 09-01-2013 at 04:23 PM.
I think abandoning this completely is my biggest problem with it, I don't mind what they do about it just so long as they at least do something about it VS nothing at all.
They can slowly make adjustments to the game improving it over time, this is something that needs adjustments.
I know girls with small asses exist and I disagree about the shoulders I think they look odd now because there is no backside to match lol, but there backs and ass are still likely in proportion with there body because over all there mass is smaller and there front is probably small to match... unless they have breast implants..
Last edited by Vandark; 09-01-2013 at 04:33 PM.

marisa would like some butt too! come on SE!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.






