SMN - knowing the class (part 1)

[Dixa]

-No parser properly tracks DoTs because they are not in the combat log. At all.

-No they don't. Now, I'm not saying we're stronger than BRDs(they are the top DPS), but Bio II is 350 potency vs Windbite's 320, and Miasma is 320 potency versus Venomous Bite's 310. Then we also have Thunder and Bio which are 240 a piece.

bio 2 takes 30 seconds and miasma 24 seconds to deliver that potency vs. windbites and venomous bites 18 seconds. really, how can math be that hard for so many?

-Why are you doing healing?

because fail pugs are fail, and because i'd rather throw out a sustain than try to resummon my pet mid battle. i have not gotten around to levelling thm up to quick cast yet due to the damned login issues

[Kevee]

bio 2 takes 30 seconds and miasma 24 seconds to deliver that potency vs. windbites and venomous bites 18 seconds. really, how can math be that hard for so many?

Really, how can math be that hard? Bio II and Miasma will do more damage/GCD but less DPS/GCD.

because fail pugs are fail, and because i'd rather throw out a sustain than try to resummon my pet mid battle. i have not gotten around to levelling thm up to quick cast yet due to the damned login issues

I agree, but proper positioning greatly limits when, or if, you need to heal your pet.


I hit my daily limit, so:

dmg per gcd has little meaning when a 30 second dot does ultimately less damage than an 18 second dot, especially when you have to hard-cast that 30 and 24 second dot while the two 18 second dots are done entirely on the move.

It doesn't do less damage.

It has a higher potency. It does more damage.

It does less DPS.

Something else to note:

Just found a bug during AV, or what I hope is a bug. When you Contagion your current target and Bane to spread the higher DoT timers around, if the 15% chance to reset the DoT timer procs, then it will reset to the lower timer.

this is where simple math is failing you. it does less damage.

bio 2 does 350 potency in 30 seconds. windbite does 320 in 18 seconds.

in 30 seconds, windbite does 533 potency

in 30 seconds, misma does 387 potency

in 30 seconds, venomous bite does 516 potency.

summoner dots are less damage over time and less dps over time. which is a dumb thing to say - given the same amount of time, the ability with the higher dps does the most damage. basic, basic math.

math. it's what's for dinner.

1 GCD: Bio II - 350 Potency
1 GCD: Windbite - 320 Potency

For 1 GCD you're doing more damage and less DPS. If you want to add in a second GCD worth of skills(or 12s worth of Ruin) then add it in.

They are more damage/GCD and less DPS/GCD. This is important because we don't need to apply them as much, which lowers your DPS every time you need to re-apply the DoT.

And why this is important? This means every 18s we have an "extra" GCD, as compared to BRD, where we're not applying a DoT. The DoT is still functioning, and it lets us do other things, potentially the superior thunder/bio/miasma II(aoe), or even Ruin II + off GCD skill instead.


Again, I'm NOT saying SMN is stronger than BRD. It's not, but you're not getting why Bio II is more damage than Windbite. For a single GCD, it does more damage and less DPS. And that's important, because of the things I said above.

Edit: And not to mention RS benefits longer DoTs more, of which we can extend our DoT timers beyond the base.

[Dixa]

Really, how can math be that hard? Bio and Miasma will do more damage/GCD but less DPS/GCD.

dmg per gcd has little meaning when a 30 second dot does ultimately less damage than an 18 second dot, especially when you have to hard-cast that 30 and 24 second dot while the two 18 second dots are done entirely on the move.

It doesn't do less damage.

It has a higher potency. It does more damage.

this is where simple math is failing you. it does less damage.

bio 2 does 350 potency in 30 seconds. windbite does 320 in 18 seconds.

in 30 seconds, windbite does 533 potency

in 30 seconds, misma does 387 potency

in 30 seconds, venomous bite does 516 potency.

summoner dots are less damage over time and less dps over time. which is a dumb thing to say - given the same amount of time, the ability with the higher dps does the most damage. basic, basic math.

math. it's what's for dinner.



you continue to add dmg per gcd. this matters nothing at all.

so you get more per gcd casting summoner dots over the two archer dots. are you making some sort of half-assed assumption that the archer would never EVER refresh hit dots as they expire and ONLY A SUMMONER would EVER refresh their dots as they expire? are you referring to our filler to add to the dots? and our filler is? our filler is crap compared to the several 150+ potency abilities the archer is bringing to bear while keeping 100% uptime on their dots, some of which are off the gcd and others are guaranteed crits effectively increasing the potency by another 50%.

the fact is our base dot potency istoo low,ruin damage is too low and pet damage is too low. you don't have to be a math wizard to realize this, but any mmorpg veteran who looks at the numbers and watches/experiences how the classes play will know this. this is why bard beats blm in every encounter even though blm has insanely hard hitting abilities.

bard is the level that all dps should be performing at, whether through better skill or equivalency in abilities. no amount of skill will make up for the deficiencies of this class right now.

So you are saying a malboro in av or drakes in (I forgot name but lvl 44/47 dungeons) die in 20-25 secs? Your party must be wearing godly gear. Let's say that's the truth. If that's the case, when you are shooting one at a time, SMN has applied DoTs on all if them. So first mob died in 20-25 sec, meaning 2nd mob already took 20-25sec of health loss and 3rd mob lost 40-45 sec of health when party get to them. Isn't that better than having to attack mobs with full health? Based on your 20-25 sec rate, then 3rd mob already lost like 60%+ more health.

don't bring bane into a single target conversation. bards have better on demand aoe with higher potency, insta cast and their aoe provides the same debuff that our eye for an eye does. if a bard aoe'd the same stuff you were using bane on, the bard would be the group tank.

[Joryn]

Also something that no one is taking into account with BRD or Archer is that they can use their attacks more frequently than other classes. They have a lower cooldown timer across the board without using Skill speed food. They're always casting something and they're casting it a lot faster than anyone else. No matter if it's a DOT or DD skill. The recasting of a DOT doesn't drop their DPS that much cause in less than 1 second they're casting bloodshot or heavy shot or what have you anyway, all while being on the move. I'm not advocating that SMN does more or less damage than anyone. I'm just saying that if you're going to compare a class to another you need to know BOTH CLASSES well before you can make an informed statement. I'm a LNC/DRG and even I'm a bit O_o over how much damage Archers/BRDs can put out given that in 1.0 they were a strict support class.