Hamlet Defense?

[Abriael]

That's disappointing.

No, that's *realistic*

Ans so? Did I say I want them now? I want to know.

I'm sure you do. But you're not entitled to, until they decide that the feature is finalyzed enough to be publicized. That's all there's to it.

By the way, saying that Yoshida isn't better than tanaka at communicating info is absolutely laughable. Yoshida gives us a ton of info. Tanaka gave very little. He just does that when that info is finalyzed, like *any* game developer with a grain of professionality does and should do.

You demanding info doesn't mean that you're entitled to it whenever you want. As a matter of fact, you're not.

[Gramul]

Realistic can be diappointing.

[Abriael]

I'm waiting...

The fact that something is coming in the future is, by definition *information*. The fact that it's not enough for you is absolutely inconsequential.
You're not entitled to know every little detail of future development until such details are finalyzed. Demanding it over and over doesn't change this simple fact.

Realistic can be diappointing.

Fairy tale land -> That way.

[Gramul]

I have no idea why your so compelled to argue with me, but people are dissapointed with reality all the time.

The point is, we're trying to keep comunications wide and open so we can help the game appeal to us. We're doing it for us, for Square, and for you.

[Abriael]

I
The point is, we're trying to keep comunications wide and open so we can help the game appeal to us. We're doing it for us, for Square, and for you.

Demanding for them to publicize non-finalized information not only helps no one, but is also detrimental when a developer communicates information than is afterwards revealed incorrect or changed.
You're doing it for your personal curiosity, please don't presume you're doing it for me.

[Gramul]

Demanding for them to publicize non-finalized information not only helps no one, but is also detrimental when a developer communicates information than is afterwards revealed incorrect or changed.
You're doing it for your personal curiosity, please don't presume you're doing it for me.

I'm not demanding anything. All I have done was raise the subject as a suggestion. Revealing information, explaining the concepts behind them and explaining the reason for removal should such a situation occur can only help us understand their ideas, and our responses could help them shape those ideas into well constructed features we can all enjoy.

You don't have to demonize it, and you don't have to demonize me.

[Alcide]

The fact that something is coming in the future is, by definition *information*. The fact that it's not enough for you is absolutely inconsequential.
You're not entitled to know every little detail of future development until such details are finalyzed. Demanding it over and over doesn't change this simple fact.

LoL
And if they keep saying just this for months can you still consider it "informations"? Every little detail? We know nothing about anything. Whenever we try to ask basic questions the only answer we get is "we'll tell you sometime in the future" and sometimes we are even ignored! (I remember a post of someone making basic, simple, general questions, with tons of replies from people saying he made really interesting arguments, it was here since the forum's launch and the moderators or the devs didn't bother to answer, same thing for another guy making questions about the future of the battle system)
Obviousely i can't claim for more infos, but still you can't fool yourself pretending we are communicating with the devs, coz clearely we are not, simple fact.