The concern is as Momomi pointed out: current threads are being drowned out by old threads unnecessarily. Spam is spam, and anyone that actually likes coming to the forums to see what's up and discuss things will have a hard time doing so when they have to dig through a pile of spam to do it.
The master thread's topic could be anything. Fact of the matter is (at least some of) the necros were done to revive multiple threads for the sake of amusement, regardless of the kind of amusement. Rather than simply make a thread with a positive topic or 2, several threads were revived. This is identical to creating several new threads, spam no matter how you look at it, and that has the opposite effect of what some like Kaiva were hoping to achieve. Sure some find it amusing, but not all.
As for waltzing in and derailing a topic, there was no topic to derail, unless it was of this necromancy game. It's called necroing for a reason... The thread was dead, should've stayed that way. Some of the threads necro'd as of late can still have relevance and those are the threads I did not report anyone in. Threads like this one and the other with a completely outdated topic that should not be revived on the other hand... And then there is the pattern of the fact this recent string of necros isn't going to end. That is why I voiced my concern. You may think me rude for doing this if you like, but frankly spam itself is rude in its own way, intentional or not. Also I never once implied I have authority over anyone, that's just an assumption you made in my attempt to call out what is truly wrong with all these necros. I also did not call trolling without merit, as the necroing itself has lead into that happening when some of us voiced concern over all the necroing in an attempt to defend it.



Reply With Quote

