Thanks. I don't see the AF2 pants as being better, but I guess it's just to keep up the accuracy after the other slots are filled with Allagan? I guess I will go for helm first, then a toss up between chest or neck/bracelet maybe.Imho, AF2 helm is better than allagan visor, the +6crit it's better than the determination, this is the only one AF2 piece which is worth it. The AF2 legs are also better than allagan, but without the turn 5 gear, the +34acc force you to drop other bis piece to not exceed too much the acc cap.
This is my bis pre turn 5 implying allagan cuirass doesn't drop on turn 1-4 : http://en.xivdb.com/?wardrobe/2099/mnk3
With the turn 5 : http://en.xivdb.com/?wardrobe/2097/mnk (just add the 3 bis from t5 and switch legs and neck for acc)
I think you should buy the AF2 helm, maybe, idk, gl
It's just my opinion, but I think AF2 legs are our best way too be acc capped with turn 5 weap/chest/wrists
Rapiso 'World Best Monk' Tapiso - Black Hope - Moogle
Stream : http://www.twitch.tv/lerapiso
Cool Site : http://www.ffxiv-codex.fr/



Personally, I wouldn't go for the Melee Circlet over the Allagan Visor... sorry but, I don't see how +6 crit is better than +15 determination. As for the rest of your set, it looks good.Imho, AF2 helm is better than allagan visor, the +6crit it's better than the determination, this is the only one AF2 piece which is worth it. The AF2 legs are also better than allagan, but without the turn 5 gear, the +34acc force you to drop other bis piece to not exceed too much the acc cap.
This is my bis pre turn 5 implying allagan cuirass doesn't drop on turn 1-4 : http://en.xivdb.com/?wardrobe/2099/mnk3
With the turn 5 : http://en.xivdb.com/?wardrobe/2097/mnk (just add the 3 bis from t5 and switch legs and neck for acc)
I think you should buy the AF2 helm, maybe, idk, gl
It's 21 crit vs 15 determination in my mind, and i think 21 crit is slightly better than 15 determination.
Rapiso 'World Best Monk' Tapiso - Black Hope - Moogle
Stream : http://www.twitch.tv/lerapiso
Cool Site : http://www.ffxiv-codex.fr/
Any geared monks finding their enmity/threat skyrocketing? I've been slowly getting gear (relic +1, more darklight pieces, etc) and I don't know if it is just the tank in my FC, but even when I waited a bit on the pull, I'd still eventually build up enough enmity to pull off of him.
Would be neat if they also made fists of wind lower enmity or something like that![]()
How geared is your tank and what fights do you experience this problem? There are many factors to be taken into consideration.Any geared monks finding their enmity/threat skyrocketing? I've been slowly getting gear (relic +1, more darklight pieces, etc) and I don't know if it is just the tank in my FC, but even when I waited a bit on the pull, I'd still eventually build up enough enmity to pull off of him.
Would be neat if they also made fists of wind lower enmity or something like that
Hardcore PvE Free Companyhttp://mercenary-guild.eu/

just sounds like some bad tanks mnk has very low enimty generation regardless of how stellar there dps is.Any geared monks finding their enmity/threat skyrocketing? I've been slowly getting gear (relic +1, more darklight pieces, etc) and I don't know if it is just the tank in my FC, but even when I waited a bit on the pull, I'd still eventually build up enough enmity to pull off of him.
Would be neat if they also made fists of wind lower enmity or something like that

I am currently contemplating about getting sphairai +1... Is it worth getting Sphairai +1 or should I just use my points on Accessories/armor?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote





