Ok so then will this work to say if I sleep an enemy using chained macro?
/mk attack3 <t>
/ac "Sleep" <t>
/p I'm sleeping number 3! Please don't attack it.
Ok so then will this work to say if I sleep an enemy using chained macro?
/mk attack3 <t>
/ac "Sleep" <t>
/p I'm sleeping number 3! Please don't attack it.
Yes it would, Neko!
Although there are a few better icons to use than the attack ones (there's a bind and an X one).
Just to note, there ARE placeholders (stuff like <t>) to target specific icons regardless of where they are. <attack1> will target whoever has the Attack #1 icon whereas... <bind1> was it? will attack whoever has the Chain #1 icon
<Target to Bind 1> is the one you're thinking of. All the marks show what command it is when you mouseover them in the signs window.Yes it would, Neko!
Although there are a few better icons to use than the attack ones (there's a bind and an X one).
Just to note, there ARE placeholders (stuff like <t>) to target specific icons regardless of where they are. <attack1> will target whoever has the Attack #1 icon whereas... <bind1> was it? will attack whoever has the Chain #1 icon
Ah ok then. So then is there away to say change target in macro instead of using the "tab" or the "Dpad" and say to sleep 2 enemies with 1 micro chain?Yes it would, Neko!
Although there are a few better icons to use than the attack ones (there's a bind and an X one).
Just to note, there ARE placeholders (stuff like <t>) to target specific icons regardless of where they are. <attack1> will target whoever has the Attack #1 icon whereas... <bind1> was it? will attack whoever has the Chain #1 icon
I actually believe I saw a "target next" ability in the actions menu so I imagine that would work. Something like /ac "target next" <me> or whatever the command is actually called (it's been my experience that if you don't have a target for an action you need to use <me> as a placeholder but I may be wrong). However, I don't think it would be a very trustworthy macro unless you know what the next target with be 100%. A mouseover macro would be safer.
=^.^= Many thanks. I think I have a grasp of it now. Only thing left is wait for EA and experiment with it.I actually believe I saw a "target next" ability in the actions menu so I imagine that would work. Something like /ac "target next" <me> or whatever the command is actually called (it's been my experience that if you don't have a target for an action you need to use <me> as a placeholder but I may be wrong). However, I don't think it would be a very trustworthy macro unless you know what the next target with be 100%. A mouseover macro would be safer.
Well if the tank has set targets for say 3 targets you could use -
/ac "Sleep" <mark2>
/wait 3
/ac "Sleep" <mark3>
/wait 2
/ta <mark1>
that will sleep target 2 & 3 and then target the one you are fighting.
not sure if <st> (select target) works in XIV like it did in XI but that obviously requires physical input outside of 1 macro.
Last edited by Nihonnick; 08-23-2013 at 09:58 AM. Reason: typo!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.