Well this thread is a startWhenever they have stuff like this, wish there is a way like create a new thread with all the questions and someone nice enough to summarize and put questions of same category together then post in the official question thread or something.
Some questions are different although it sounds the same so those need to be carefully read.
I agree, but I still can't be bothered to do it myself. Dinner time in 20mins.It would be more helpful to answer the questions that already been asked for player's who don't know the answer to their question which has been responded to already by the devs in my opinion. Sure people should search the forums or check out the live events but let’s be honest here people will not do that if they can get a quick responds to their question beside doing a search for it or watching a 1hr+ video in subtitle’s they will do that instead.
Oh gdi, the question I asked on post #3 just got re-asked on post #141.
Also
Remember that when there are two separate posts for one question, each of them are also likely to get less likes than if they were combined into one (as extra posts cause people to skip reading the previously posted questions and liking them). This means the question is also less likely to get answered and that's why it's more useful to like a previously posted question instead of repeating it.
Maybe the people who have posted two very similar questions could combine their questions into one and remove the extra one?
True it shouldn't fall onto your shoulder's to do this either their should already be a sticky thread with the most popular asked question's people have asked and has been responded to by the dev's and be updated regularly it should be ran by the dev's tbh not by us really but if people want to answer the question to the best of their knowledge to help out it welcome also not telling people hey that a duplicate question.I agree, but I still can't be bothered to do it myself. Dinner time in 20mins.
Oh gdi, the question I asked on post #3 just got re-asked on post #141.
Also
You really don't have to specifically say the words to imply them completely with your post. There is also perception to take into account. My opinion wasn't changed because of what you specifically said, but how I perceived what you said, your underlying tone, and the lack of necessity of it all.
You might be right about me needing to find something better to do with my time, however under no pretext do I think that I am policing the thread nor did I ever say SE needed me. On that note, I never said I was important, quite the contrary I said I was a meager speck upon a speck ad infinum.
Yeah there's going to be multiple questions. I'm sure some people saw "submit question here" and clicked that and just posted without reading anything.. and by not reading anything I mean absolutely nothing. Not even what they posted.
The more I think about it, the more I would rather they had just given us a set of 15-20 catagories and asked us which ones we wanted to hear the most about, instead of taking specific questions. It may just be showmanship, but I'd rather the showmanship of a well made, pre-scripted demonstration on these live letters than the more random Q&A format.
As long as they let us pick what topics we're most interested in, we would end up getting more information overall, since they won't feel obligated to answer super specific questions like some that I've seen on that thread already. Not to mention, the more open-ended the questions are, the more likely it is that they will tell us more (by accident or on purpose).
I'm sorry, but insulting a person with the term "dense" is not low on the food chain of insults. You are calling a persons intelligence into question. Are you suggesting that they lack the intellect to comprehend the context of the related subject? Or did you mean something non-insulting like, they have a high mass to volume ratio? Then you're just calling them fat.
I think you meant to use dense in this way: slow to understand : stupid, thickheaded
Stupid: not having or showing an ability to absorb ideas readily.
By the way, you need to go through you "duplicate" questions again and revise them. Some questions might be related in there theme (category) but ask two completely different questions.
One asks how GATHERING will work, the other asks hwo LEVELING will work, and what are the BENEFITS.
The weather question are two different questions. One asks if there will be dynamic weather, the other asks if weather will effect the environment
The spirit bind questions ask for more DETAIL of the system, the other asks WHY they want to do it.
The people who are curious about level sync, one ask IS THERE LEVEL SYNC. The other asks HOW will it work.
The loot questions one asks HOW the NEED/GREED system works, the other asks how TOKENS will work.
you see the difference? They may share the same theme but the context of the questions are unique.
Who is dense now?
Last edited by ChiefCurrahee; 02-13-2013 at 04:26 AM.
"And another one, can you confirm is Level sync will be finally present in ARR? If so, will we be able to test it on the beta?"
That question has already been answered. Check the roadmap.
I swear I may go full blown rage mode if they answer another "Can you tell us what a free company is? k thx"
I wish mom and dad would stop fighting.![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.