Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 81
  1. #51
    Player
    Zenaku's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    FL,Hialeah
    Posts
    5,526
    Character
    Zenaku Yamada
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 50
    ok if i was going to get a 100ishGB SSD which one should i get? seeing how everyone here saying not to get a OCZ one.
    (0)
    Tactics Ogre: Let Us Cling Together Autographed By "Akihiko Yoshida Tarot Card Sweepstakes Winner

  2. #52
    Player
    Vilhem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    1,919
    Character
    Vilhem Dijkstra
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Machinist Lv 90
    I got a Corsair force and personally have been happy with it.

    Is your MoBo SATAIII capable?
    (1)
    Meow

  3. #53
    Player
    Dhalmel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    little ala mhigo
    Posts
    1,694
    Character
    Luzaf Ephramad
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 60
    Samsung 840 Pro or Intel 520*
    (0)
    Last edited by Dhalmel; 02-12-2013 at 09:31 AM.

  4. #54
    Player TonyUK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    181
    Character
    Kupo'nut Cheesecake
    World
    Ragnarok
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 70
    I have OCZ Agility III SSD, it does make a difference as people have mentioned with regards to stuttering, but when you zone and that loading black screen comes up, its also fetching server data, so FFXIV isn't going to make full use of a SSD. Battlefield 3 for example can take a minute on a standard hard drive to load a map, on a SSD it takes around 5 seconds. Some games the optimisation of a SSD drive will notice considerably more than on XIV. But i would never personally go back to a normal HDD.
    Seagate do a line of solid state hybrid drives, which are part SSD part HDD, and adapt to which apps you use the most so they get stored on the Solid State part of the drive etc.
    (0)

  5. #55
    Player Eekiki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    3,214
    Character
    Kickle Cubicle
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Rogue Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by ispano View Post
    The difference people noticed in 1.X on an SSD was due to the Client having almost 200,000 files vs a game over double the size having only ~6,000 files. The SSD handles the many many small files far better than a traditional drive. For many it removed micro stutters in game due to loading data.
    Oh, and another thing I noticed is patches get applied waaay faster. ^_^
    (0)

  6. #56
    Player
    Doki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    1,478
    Character
    Doki Waku
    World
    Faerie
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 100
    I had 1.0 on a Samsung 830 SSD SATA III , 250GB drive I use for games. It loaded significantly faster than a standard drive, and I saw the largest difference with zone loading and cutscene loading. It helped out with character blinking during equip swaps as well to a lesser degree. It's a decent upgrade, but way more noticable in other games. Several games with normally long loading times have little tutorial tip messages during the loading screens that I can't even read now since the games load so much faster.
    (0)

  7. #57
    Player
    nokinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    170
    Character
    Nok Nokinator
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Fisher Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Dhalmel View Post
    Samsung 840 Pro or Intel 520*
    yes this is the one the samsung. The original i had was ocz
    (0)

  8. #58
    Player
    Kirito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    ウルダハ
    Posts
    957
    Character
    Max Wind
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 55
    I received and installed my ssd today! Much faster than before but still feels a bit slow. Looking at my performance information I see that I have a 4.9 score for processor, ram is 6.2 graphics is 6.7 and gaming graphics is 6.7 and harddrive is 7.3. is the processor a bad choice? Oh I'm using an intel core 2 duo CPU E8600 @3.33GHz
    (0)
    Last edited by Kirito; 02-13-2013 at 06:30 AM.

  9. #59
    Player
    Dhalmel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    little ala mhigo
    Posts
    1,694
    Character
    Luzaf Ephramad
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 60
    Yeah the CPU is getting there.

    Upgrade to a i5 3750/3570k or AMD FX-8320.


    Another problem is that your motherboard is still using SATAII. You will want to be on SATAIII for today's SSDs.
    (0)
    Last edited by Dhalmel; 02-13-2013 at 06:35 AM.

  10. #60
    Player
    ispano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    2,753
    Character
    Melfina Amastacia
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Lancer Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirito View Post
    I received and installed my ssd today! Much faster than before but still feels a bit slow. Looking at my performance information I see that I have a 4.9 score for processor, ram is 6.2 graphics is 6.7 and gaming graphics is 6.7 and harddrive is 7.3. is the processor a bad choice? Oh I'm using an intel core 2 duo CPU E8600 @3.33GHz
    The Core2 was king of it's generation, but it's a good 2-3 generations behind now.

    Also the Windows Experience Index is a very poor choice to use for benchmarking your hardware.
    (0)

Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... LastLast