Muahahaha

[SinisterJoint]

Is this a tech forum now? Really hope we don't start seeing threads like this..If you must know. You are better off getting a single 670 if you do not intend to go over a resolution of 1920x1080.
A 680 really shines at higher res.
A 670 will perform just as well at 1920x1080 or lower.
Save you a hundred bucks as well..
I have a 680 and build computers. I know my stuff.

Didn't start that way, it just developed into what it is...

However, nobody is making you read or reply. I do appreciate the advice though

[SinisterJoint]

I will be supported.

It is just unsupported for beta. It's up to NVIDIA and AMD to update the profiles which usually happens around the release of a major game. All SE can do is work with NVIDIA and AMD to get profiles updated sooner.

I don't think it's right to upgrade your PC for beta. You should upgrade it for release, which means two GTX 670s are fine. It's wise to actually wait till at least the benchmark is released.

Definetly not doing it for beta, doing it for when it goes live.

[Imoen]

Is this a tech forum now? Really hope we don't start seeing threads like this..
If you must know. You are better off getting a single 670 if you do not intend to go over a resolution of 1920x1080.
A 680 really shines at higher res.
A 670 will perform just as well at 1920x1080 or lower.
Save you a hundred bucks as well..
I have a 680 and build computers. I know my stuff.

Or running 3d? I have a 580 right now and it runs FFXIV in 3d ok... gets a bit laggy at times but damn it looks nice.

[SinisterJoint]

Or running 3d? I have a 580 right now and it runs FFXIV in 3d ok... gets a bit laggy at times but damn it looks nice.

ooo playing in 3D eh? I'm gonna have to research this!

[Imoen]

ooo playing in 3D eh? I'm gonna have to research this!

Ya, I hope it still looks nice in ARR hope they don't mess up any depth stuff with the UI changes, because everything drew at the right depth in 1.0 and it was so nice. (At least as far as I experienced) Nothing irritates me more than a game looking awesome in 3d but having UI things such as names or water effects drawing wrong in 3d.

[SinisterJoint]

Ya, I hope it still looks nice in ARR hope they don't mess up any depth stuff with the UI changes, because everything drew at the right depth in 1.0 and it was so nice. (At least as far as I experienced) Nothing irritates me more than a game looking awesome in 3d but having UI things such as names or water effects drawing wrong in 3d.

wish there was a way to PM you.

Assuming you need a 3D capable monitor and glasses?

[Pseudopsia]

wish there was a way to PM you.

Assuming you need a 3D capable monitor and glasses?

Since you have NVIDIA cards you must use NVIDIA 3D Vision glasses and a monitor that supports 3D Vision such as Asus 120 hz monitors for optimal performance.

People with AMD cards would use Samsung 120 hz monitor for optimal performance.

This is if you want 60 FPS per eye full resolution.

Since you use NVIDIA cards go here for details: http://www.nvidia.com/object/3d-vision-main.html

[Imoen]

wish there was a way to PM you.

Assuming you need a 3D capable monitor and glasses?

ya, or tv that is 3d capable, pretty sure nvidia has it so you can roll it on tv as well.

(Aye, wish they had a PM feature on these forums, if they do I don't know about it.)

[Altena]

I would giggle a little bit if you cannot run 2 clients at the same time..

I am personally just praying for a dual monitor add-on (as was suggested in a thread the other day).

[ispano]

I would giggle a little bit if you cannot run 2 clients at the same time..

I am personally just praying for a dual monitor add-on (as was suggested in a thread the other day).

Considering that the addons we get will likely be far more limited than WoW, and what needs to be done to do that, not likely to happen.