Page 8 of 23 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 18 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 237

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Issachar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    526
    Character
    Astraea Starsong
    World
    Alpha
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by ShinigamiKayla View Post
    so in your mind Blizzard is close minded too for having an F2P model~
    That's a poor retort if I've ever seen one :/
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    Lady's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    506
    Character
    Lady Purrsalot
    World
    Malboro
    Main Class
    Weaver Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Issachar View Post
    SQEX is too closed-minded to go F2P. FFXI's still making money somehow. They think ARR will magically have a great playerbase (lol). Yet let's look at Sega and PSO2. F2P with cash services and it is making boatloads of cash.
    SQEX is too closed-minded because FFXIV is not a FPS! And they're too closed-minded because theres no Tauren race. And they're too closed-minded because I can't be a necromancer!

    Yeah, how dare they not make this game have everything I want!
    (2)

  3. #3
    Player
    Twiddle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    354
    Character
    Amelia Inverse
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Blacksmith Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Issachar View Post
    SQEX is too closed-minded to go F2P. FFXI's still making money somehow. They think ARR will magically have a great playerbase (lol). Yet let's look at Sega and PSO2. F2P with cash services and it is making boatloads of cash.
    Just saying reputation > cash
    going f2p = - reputation
    (2)

  4. #4
    Player
    indira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,376
    Character
    Indira Cliodhna
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Issachar View Post
    SQEX is too closed-minded to go F2P. FFXI's still making money somehow. They think ARR will magically have a great playerbase (lol). Yet let's look at Sega and PSO2. F2P with cash services and it is making boatloads of cash.
    PSO a different kind of game its built around taking your money like planetside2. watch when sega starts to lose player base there gonna pull the plug like PSO.
    (1)

  5. #5
    Player
    Reinheart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Subligania
    Posts
    5,831
    Character
    Reinheart Valentine
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 86
    Final Fantasy title should be no problem staying P2P... look at how many weirdo's out there buying the same Final Fantasy 1 every time it's re-released..... (I'm one of those weirdo's... orz) FF has a huge fan base, I bet it won't go F2P.
    (6)

  6. #6
    Player
    Radacci's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    1,699
    Character
    Austen Bloodspatter
    World
    Omega
    Main Class
    Lancer Lv 80
    i played f2p games that suck terribly, but are still going.
    even if ff14 went f2p it still wouldn't fail. 1.0 was fail, and still had quite a lot of players.
    f2p games make company more money. but hopefully they wouldn't put out stupid cash items, like increase meld chance, and you cant break item if you fail meld. that would quickly make IRL rich people have 5x meld sets.
    i'm not worried anyways.
    reason tera is f2p is i guess simply not many ppl play it, and it wasn't such a known game anyways. Many people i mentioned it to, had never heard of it. FF is very known brand, so i doubt it's gonna go the same way.
    (0)

  7. #7
    Player
    Pwnagraphic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Ul'Dah
    Posts
    669
    Character
    Pwna Graphic
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Dannythm View Post
    Just read that Tera is going free to play in the US and EU, and people are commenting that they give ARR from 4 to 8 months after release to follow the same route as all the other MMO's the last years...

    I fear for the mindset of the population, not about the quality of the game, that may force it's demise...
    Heeeh.. I dunno. Never played Tera so I can't make a judgement off of it, but I didn't see that game being real popular anyway. Some of these companies pay reviewers, streamers, etc to hype their game up sometimes which I felt Tera had a lot of. Just overrated hype..

    Another thing that FFXIV has on its side is the PS3 version. There's actually quite a few people who were interested in the PS3 version of the game and still are. People want an MMO on the PS3/ consoles and that was proven with DCUO it's just that SOE couldn't on to their player base after end game. SE just needs to grab the audience and hold them. I think they'll do just fine, but only time will tell.
    (1)

  8. #8
    Player
    Ticks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    243
    Character
    Shady Grove
    World
    Mateus
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 90
    I wouldn't want to see ARR going F2P. I would rather pay every month and have SE give us support teams to maintain the game and developers to design new content. I want the game I plan on spending hours enjoying be financially able to grow over the years. When television is F2P - you get local channels...when you pay for cable or satellite - you get the world.
    (3)
    http://

  9. #9
    Player
    Xatsh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Uldah
    Posts
    2,011
    Character
    Xatsh Vei
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    White Mage Lv 90
    Tera is a dying mmo ( it has failed in literally every market it has released in) therefor they are going f2p to try to save it. Battle system is probally one of the best in the genre... everything else in that game is horrible. Same as EQ2, SWToR, and many other mmos that were once p2p. The company that made Tera does not have the capital to fix the mess they made. That game has potential but needs so much more work... the investors are getting angry so no more money is flowing in.

    If XIV 2.0 loses subs like version 1.0 does they will probably make it free to play and run it on a skeleton crew. Can't cancel a numbered title this soon. If this happens the game is pretty much over though.


    Honestly I hope this game just shuts off if it fails. This f2p madness that is spreading needs to stop. The model is just bad for the player and is just so the devs can make a quick buck at players expense. The negatives of F2P (including the fact the game cost more to actually play... so not really free to play) far outweigh the negatives of p2p.
    (1)

  10. #10
    Player
    Zantetsuken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,979
    Character
    Siorai Aduaidh
    World
    Leviathan
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 50
    When all is said and done, FFXIV might be the most expensive game ever made, so F2P isn't an option for SE.

    Not only that, but a change to F2P is often seen as beginning of the death of an MMO game, which is the LAST thing FFXIV needs considering the 1.0 reception.

    If SE wants to make this game great, it should actually charge a bit more the average market subscription price.

    People who pay more for the game will value it more, and the composition and attitudes of the FFXIV community will be generally better than any cheaper P2P or F2P game.

    And that will result in a growing number of people who tell their friends to join, and less players that want to quit for something else.
    (0)
    Last edited by Zantetsuken; 01-10-2013 at 09:04 AM.

Page 8 of 23 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 18 ... LastLast