i would only use linux but they dont have a standard yet. the big distros devs need to get together and make a different repository thats has a standardization so everything works on all distros.
Google can play a big part of setting that standard, we all know Android is pretty much based off of Debian. They could promote it heavily as the "consumer" standard to hardware OEMs and driver writers.
Nvidia already has good support for linux, and valve's attempt to bring more gaming to it shows signs of change.
linux will never get those major PC releases. corporations want lock-outs designed and catered specifically to them Microsoft is happy to oblige that, linux will never support any DRM technology ever HDCP, secur-rom, laser lock, this list can stretch miles and most games use up to 4 different types of DRM. the lack of native DX only makes the already apparent dream of Linux becoming a gaming OS farther awayGoogle can play a big part of setting that standard, we all know Android is pretty much based off of Debian. They could promote it heavily as the "consumer" standard to hardware OEMs and driver writers.
Nvidia already has good support for linux, and valve's attempt to bring more gaming to it shows signs of change.
And hows that working for them..? :Plinux will never get those major PC releases. corporations want lock-outs designed and catered specifically to them Microsoft is happy to oblige that, linux will never support any DRM technology ever HDCP, secur-rom, laser lock, this list can stretch miles and most games use up to 4 different types of DRM. the lack of native DX only makes the already apparent dream of Linux becoming a gaming OS farther away
If you're implying that DRM can't be made for Linux you're wrong. No one has bothered to make DRM in Linux there's no real benefit to it, not because it can't be done.Linux will never get those major PC releases. corporations want lock-outs designed and catered specifically to them Microsoft is happy to oblige that, Linux will never support any DRM technology ever HDCP, secur-rom, laser lock, this list can stretch miles and most games use up to 4 different types of DRM. the lack of native DX only makes the already apparent dream of Linux becoming a gaming OS farther away
You're also implying that the developer can't simultaneously make an OpenGL version of a game.
What's funny is that all of those methods you've mentioned have already been hacked.
Last edited by Dhalmel; 01-10-2013 at 04:06 AM.
it'll never happen the Linux community would tear it apart like a pack of starve mad piranha's. the distro would be dead before it ever got to release.
you think just becuase the games Graphical programing language is written in OpenGL it Magically becomes Linux compatible? easier to port sure, but my point was the majority of top rate titles are not programed in OpenGL. for linux not only would the executables and files need to be compatible you would also need to make the graphical API compatible. A huge waist of resources and publisher money.
whats even more ironic is they were more than likely hacked using Linux.
I wouldn't be so sure seeing how there are still people defending the bizzare design choices M$ is forcing unto their win8 customers... and linux has still a long way to go.
The only ray of hope for linux in regards to gaming is valve porting some steam games to it.
[ AMD Phenom II X4 970BE@4GHz | 12GB DDR3-RAM@CL7 | nVidia GeForce 260GTX OC | Crucial m4 SSD ]
If I can play 1.0 on Windows 8 then I will be able to play 2.0 on Windows 8... Oh yeah... I can with NO PROBLEM after you apply the Windows Updates it needs.
I'm not calling the OS "invalid", I just don't consider it in the list because it wasn't marketed for home users. Thus most people who aren't hardcore enthusiasts don't know about it. I don't care whether it is good or bad, it doesn't count for this list because this list is for home end-user versions of windows.
Steam is coming to linux. Standard Steam DRM applies.it'll never happen the Linux community would tear it apart like a pack of starve mad piranha's. the distro would be dead before it ever got to release.
Most linux users aren't against retail software being available on linux- Some purists won't install any non-free (Free in the context of freedom, not price) software on a linux machine, but most people are just looking for an alternative to Winodws because they don't like it or don't like Microsoft for whatever reason.
Last edited by Alhanelem; 01-10-2013 at 09:32 AM.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.