I don't need to bring in the whole population of a city to prove a case. I don't need to find every single person that saw an incident. All I need are a few witnesses, and in that thread there are plenty.
translation of the above: "insert completely unrelated and unfitting comparison here".Edit: Reinheart is twice the man you can ever be! At least he gives all sources to his "translation claims" and makes sure there's not a huge debate on his thread.
Reinheart is not making any claim. He's providing a translation. The "twice the man" thing is just another personal attack.
I provided you with an entire thread, with multiple people confirming it. That's way more than a "snippet". If that's not enough for you (very conveniently, as it disproves your claim), that's your problem, not mine.If your going to make a bold claim, give all sources that supports that pillar. You say it's all over Twitter? Should be easy enough to link it to me? you won't do it? Either lazy or its Fictional.
You made the claim not I show me "ALL" the proof. not a snippet
Starlord: Show me the proof!
Abriael: here, have at it.
Starlord: NO! Show me the proof!
Abriael: here, have at it.
Starlord: NO! Show me the proof!
Abriael: here, have at it.
Starlord: NO! Show me the proof!
Abriael: here, have at it.
It gets ridiculous after a bit.
I did, and you continuing to repeat like a mantra that I didn't doesn't really change that fact.If you don't wanna show me proof
Only that multiple witnesses *are* evidence. So you'd walk free only if the investigation can disprove their testimony.
Go ahead and disprove them, if you can.
Mind you. I do find it absolutely hilarious that SE didn't try to disprove what they said (and it would be extremely easy for them to, if it was indeed false) but you two are ready to fly in the face of simple logic in order to try.