If some people that got in lied they would test it 24/7 and don't log on they gonna lose the spot
![]()
If some people that got in lied they would test it 24/7 and don't log on they gonna lose the spot
![]()


Why are people forgetting, that Yoshi wants alpha to be running 24/7 from here on out. more invites will come between weds & next week.
Plus, by mid-Beta, all of us will be playing with our saved data restored, playing the full game. Just for the promise of early access to the game as we (1.0 players) don't have to buy the retail copy to play (I only plan to buy the CE edition for the artwork).
This is from Yoshi's mouth himself. Even the PS3 players will be playing this game way after the PC users have been on it for a couple of months.
"You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war."

Didnt got in but some people saying they havent send emails to NA yet only europ ^_^
FFXI 2002-2011 SMN BLU SCH BLM NIN
FFXIV 2010 - 2012 Ver1.0 Blm Drg whm
FFXIV alpha beta drg blm
FFXIV beta 2 Drg
FFXIV beta 3 and 4 Drg SMN blm



"Thy life is a river to bear rapture and sorrow
To listen to suffer to entrust until tomorrow
In one fleeting moment, from the land doth life flow
Yet in one fleeting moment for the new leaf doth grow"

Not to feed the trolls, but Dragonheart's thread wasn't deleted, it glitched earlier (noticed it go "down" while browsing it) and is back now.
![]()





When a GM needs to lotus blade a thread they first flash bind it. In other words the thread gets disabled while they whoop its ass and then the thread comes back changed.



That's not something I'd call a "glitch", and the method described by Shogun isn't exactly what I'd call kosher in moderation, as making a thread disappear for several hours obviously makes people think it's been deleted. Normally you'd lock it, with a notice, and then unlock it again when it's cleaned.
The prolonged disappearance of a thread with 400 posts causes all sorts of unpleasant misunderstandings, while locking keeps things nice and clean.
Still, the concerns expressed in it (and here) should be answered, and that's the biggest issue.
Last edited by Abriael; 11-27-2012 at 06:24 PM.

fair enough. I was just twitching catching up on this thread and reading 10 pages of "Se is evil they deleted my/dragonhearts thread QQ".Originally Posted by Shougun
Originally Posted by Rosenkreuz
Not to feed the trolls, but Dragonheart's thread wasn't deleted, it glitched earlier (noticed it go "down" while browsing it) and is back now.
When a GM needs to lotus blade a thread they first flash bind it. In other words the thread gets disabled while they whoop its ass and then the thread comes back changed.
Read to the end to make sure no one else mentioned it before posting myself that it wasn't in fact deleted.![]()
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.







