I was just wondering this lately. It looks like the shutting down of 1.0 was on schedule with the timeline of patches and end of the world changes presented in the road map earlier this year. But if the testing and development of 2.0 was pushed back a few months from the projected release date, why didn't they leave 1.0 up and wait for the world to end with that setback in mind? Or at least wait until Beta testing was complete or nearing completion to announce the end the world?
I am thinking they should have left the final save date as tentative as the release date planned for 2.0 in order to have a smooth transition. Does anyone know of the reason? I'm not trying to be petty or complain, I'm just wondering if there is anyone else wondering this, and what the reason might be?![]()