Noticeable.
Interesting, since on TERA people hate the random number generator like smoke in the eyes, but don't hate chronoscrolls. As a matter of fact, they're well loved.Somethings are safe to assume - hate on pay to win is one of them. Like hate on the random number generator.
No. Reducing the influence of RMT on the market was. And it has been achieved elsewhere. It can be achieved here if well implemented.If increasing RMT demand was your goal. Sure.
You telling it increases the demand based on absurd concepts that have nothing to do with economy and reality doesn't make it so.You will never be rid of it - but without supporting it in any fashion and only demoting it you will have a real effect on demand, unlike increasing the demand.
Point stands though. if "RMT is still there" is a valid argument to dismiss PLEX, it's a valid argument to dismiss everything that results in it.
Looking at how you fail to understand it, I doubt it.I've played the system, I get it.
You saying it does doesn't make it true. i'm quite sure the devs of two different MMORPG knows if it does quite a lot better than you (or me, mind you).If there was a vote to add the system then so be it - but NEVER in its description should it say "preventive measures aganist RMT" as it promotes RMT.
They aren't just "dealing with it", they like it a lot. The same would quite probably happen here. Besides the fact that it combats RMT, people love convenient things, and this system is very convenient.Players will deal with shit just like humans will deal with shit for so long - its just not best to push their shit buttons.. (lots of shit.. lol)
Being a gamer doesn't give you as much knowledge of the industry as a professional, regardless of your lung capacity.Considering that I breath the game industry in all aspects of its design I would disagree.
Ask any MMORPG developer what "pay to win" is, and they'll repeat the definition I gace verbatim or almost. That's because that's exactly what I'm doing with the definition I heard from every single one of them I ever talked to. And they're many.
Last edited by Abriael; 11-07-2012 at 05:35 PM.
Gotcha, you were just trying to attack my credibility because you can't attack my arguments, but as Aenarion said...
It really doesn't help your side.
I am a modder and have a small indie project going on (its cute and takes so much damn time >.> lol). But beyond that I read professional articles and frequent books written by those who have been in key industry roles before.
It is not safe to assume your knowledge is unique to the forums, or the just job position.
Maybe we will run again if Yoshi starts talking about new payment systems but until then we just spent a good few pages talking about the same things over and over.. lol
Last edited by Shougun; 11-07-2012 at 05:34 PM.
I thought this was a cool thread at first, some nice ideas being thrown around but it's devolved into pages and pages of people on both sides attacking each-other again.
I can understand that people have very strong views on both sides of the fence, but is this really the right way to voice them? Resorting to personal attacks demeans you, let's be civilized D:
Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of another, always at the same time as an end and never simply as a means
Can't attack =/= debating a wall
dismissal =/= debate
At this point I'm pretty much just sitting back with the popcorn to watch the show, while throwing in a comment or two here and thereI thought this was a cool thread at first, some nice ideas being thrown around but it's devolved into pages and pages of people on both sides attacking each-other again.
I can understand that people have very strong views on both sides of the fence, but is this really the right way to voice them? Resorting to personal attacks demeans you, let's be civilized D:
Frankly all that can be said has been said more than enough times from both sides, the poor horse is not only dead and beaten, it's been pulverized at this point.
This argument has about as much chance to be productive as a debate about abortion between a tea partier and a feminist activist![]()
I like that analogy haha XDAt this point I'm pretty much just sitting back with the popcorn to watch the show, while throwing in a comment or two here and there
Frankly all that can be said has been said more than enough times from both sides, the poor horse is not only dead and beaten, it's been pulverized at this point.
This argument has about as much chance to be productive as a debate about abortion between a tea partier and a feminist activist
*tries not to step in the horse-mush*
Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of another, always at the same time as an end and never simply as a means
Point A: Cash to gil conversions allow Player 1 with money to purchase rare, high-end goods in a fraction of the time it takes Player 2 to farm the same gil
Point B: the more these valuables are purchased by the newly rich players, the higher their demand, as standard means of farming the goods remains flush due to thedifficulty to earn.
Point C supply and demand kicks in- prices rise, the goods become less attainable by standard gil farming, and due to a quick fix being advertised, more are encouraged to purchase what they need to compete in the high end of the game with real money.
The cycle of pay to win begins. sure, some folks, or more specifically powerful linkshells profit, but this could easily spiral into a caste system that, at least in XIV, could have many unfortunate consequences.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.