Quote Originally Posted by Abriael View Post
So before i was insulting. Now i'm rude and abrasive. Call me when you get to the final verison

I just don't feel the need to sweeten the pill when someone tries so hard to mislead the audience.
Seriously? What do you think is a resultant feeling of being insulted? Joy? It is within the same lines. Dont even play that they are different versions.


Quote Originally Posted by Abriael View Post
No, it adds a supplier in a condition of radical advantage, as it can offer a service that its competitors can't offer. Security.

Thus, it shifts the demand on itself and away from suppliers that don't offer that service.
Ok so.. either I missread you are you have been mislead I felt you said that you were saying that PLEX will reduce the demand on RMT. But now you are saying it will just switch hands...


Quote Originally Posted by Abriael View Post
They can be as competitive as they want, but security is a rather prized merchandise when you're playing with something that costs months if not year to grow. Even if demand were to raise (unlikely, demand is not governed by offer, that's why you have two variables and not just one), it would raise for PLEX, not for gilsellers.
Yes - of course.


Quote Originally Posted by Abriael View Post
The system got rid of part of the RMT and of part of the negative effects (inflation due to constant injection in the market of unmanageable quantities of gil) of RMT. It's a victory and much, much better than nothing.
The system will only get rid of unmanageable quantities of gil if gil sellers were creating a false demand - which I have no idea how they would do that. Since RMT existence hasnt changed (PLEX system is RMT).

And I dont consider it a victory at all. I dont want a game that promotes RMT. I rather have it happen in the blackmarket with very high danger then happen safely within rule.