If you legitimize dollar to gil conversions, you are encouraging the players to adopt a pay-to-win mentality.
There is no gray area there- one directly influences the other.
If you support this, which it sounds like you do, good for you.



If you legitimize dollar to gil conversions, you are encouraging the players to adopt a pay-to-win mentality.
There is no gray area there- one directly influences the other.
If you support this, which it sounds like you do, good for you.



Nope. As in this system there's nothing you can buy that anyone else can't get with normal gameplay. Paying doesn't guarantee any "win".



What's my XIV background? Making assumptions again?
According to the most widely accepted definition in the industry Pay to Win (as I already specified multiple times) implies an advantage that cannot be gained with normal gameplay.
IE: selling boosters that raise stats over their natural values (and that aren't available as drops, craftables and such), gear that is more powerful than what's available in game, enchant materials that are superior to the ones available in game and so forth.
Gil can easily be matched with normal gameplay, and it's even further from pay to win as in ARR gil won't even let you buy the best equipment in the game, that will be untradable.



you...want me to spell out your achievements?
Whatever ruse you are trying to trap me with, isn't going to work. Way to tangent.



You accused me of making assumptions, and I explained as far as was necessary. You sir, began this tangential whirlwind.
And for that I say...grats?



I thought this was a cool thread at first, some nice ideas being thrown around but it's devolved into pages and pages of people on both sides attacking each-other again.
I can understand that people have very strong views on both sides of the fence, but is this really the right way to voice them? Resorting to personal attacks demeans you, let's be civilized D:
Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of another, always at the same time as an end and never simply as a means


At this point I'm pretty much just sitting back with the popcorn to watch the show, while throwing in a comment or two here and thereI thought this was a cool thread at first, some nice ideas being thrown around but it's devolved into pages and pages of people on both sides attacking each-other again.
I can understand that people have very strong views on both sides of the fence, but is this really the right way to voice them? Resorting to personal attacks demeans you, let's be civilized D:
Frankly all that can be said has been said more than enough times from both sides, the poor horse is not only dead and beaten, it's been pulverized at this point.
This argument has about as much chance to be productive as a debate about abortion between a tea partier and a feminist activist![]()
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote



