Thread: Mages, TP, and 2.0

Of course not, everyone gets a sprint ability that consumes TP . Mages can sprint their asses off now

(slight sarcasm)

Originally Posted by Shougun

Of course not, everyone gets a sprint ability that consumes TP . Mages can sprint their asses off now

(slight sarcasm)

Sprint! Of course! Its all coming together now. RUN FORREST!

there's been other threads on this, and I would love to have a use for TP.

If nothing else, at least the MP-giving WS should come back, or some other means of consuming the TP we inevitiably gain for some kind of purpose, even if it's just some non-offensive ability.

It was said that we will cast spells with our weapon in ARR, so maybe it will get reincorporated in some way.

Originally Posted by Biggs

Will mages continue to needlessly gather tp in 2.0? I ask because the new version seems to require that you have your weapon out when casting, and this got me thinking that may be for some other reason than to stop us from recovering mp in battle. I would love to see tp reincorporated into the mage classes in some way. And if it isn't, will we still gather it in combat needlessly?

Acceptable responses include:

No
Yes
and: You will continue gathering tp for no reason in 2.0 and LIKE it!

You wouldn't be gathering it at all... in or out of combat since TP starts at full in ARR... Though it would be nice to see it used in some way for mages other then just sprint...

The cat is interested =+.+=

Originally Posted by Alhanelem

there's been other threads on this

I love this statement. Its a statement that says, "this issue has been asked before and gone unanswered, shame on you for not having read every post on the forum before posting."

Maybe we will use TP for Limit break too? haha ..but really you could ask the same about craft classes my weaver has more HP and MP than my BLM and that doesn't make sense xD

Originally Posted by Biggs

I love this statement. Its a statement that says, "this issue has been asked before and gone unanswered, shame on you for not having read every post on the forum before posting."

No it says "You could have used search function and posted in an existing thread instead of opening a new one cause of lazyness"

Originally Posted by Biggs

I love this statement. Its a statement that says, "this issue has been asked before and gone unanswered, shame on you for not having read every post on the forum before posting."

No, it says what moriandrio said. It also doesn't imply previous threads "went unanswered." others probably wouldn't know about it if nobody answered them.