Thread: What 1.0 and Tanaka did good

Originally Posted by Gokulo

The problem is that between the two systems we had exp system changes so you can't really directly compare the two. If, e.g. the system did not change, then you could guess the scenario by Soukyuu would simply mean that w/o fatigue you got the same exp as you do with rested. Of course it could also be the other way around. But in the end the speed of getting exp would be the same. But since you can't directly compare the numbers then you can't really argue one or the other I think.

rested exp is still not the same as fatique.
with fatique you could have reached 0% exp
with rested exp the exp don't get lower than 100%

Originally Posted by Hanabira

i didnt get very far with the old xp system, so im not sure how sparse the xp got later on. but in the early levels i thought it was great. only problem i can see would be THMs not getting as much xp because they dont nuke as often as a mrd hits. but thats what balancing is for.

For this there was a good tactic.
Wait until your party members lost many HP (best wait until the red hp numbers) -> cast AoE heal -> earn many sp ^^